Kishimoto's brilliant paradox of time and speed (no troll topic)

[BerryDerange]

That honestly makes no sense. If fate exists, everyone's entwined by it, not just the protagonists.

How is time forwarding itself? You need valid examples. Saying that something is rushed isn't an example.

Complex explanations for something simple usually means it's not true.

"How is time forwarding itself?" Let's me know you simply didn't understand. It's all in op.

Emphasis on fate has made it seem as if time is moving faster out of nowhere. Time is forwarding itself by not letting anything interfere with fate. Madara entwined in fate, was doing everything correctly because of time demanding it. Look up if perception of time makes time move faster. It's a real concept . I'm not saying fluff.

 

[BerryDerange]

I disagree. It was poorly written, but it wasn't rushed.

We perceive time differently when reading the manga, and only so much could be conveyed through one chapter.

When you watch the anime, time is flushed out.

No, the mind only makes it seemed flushed out; it's our perception of how time moves. You can make five minutes seem fast, or you can make it seem slow. It is the way which you choose to perceive it.

 

[Lightbringer]

"How is time forwarding itself?" Let's me know you simply didn't understand. It's all in op.

Emphasis on fate has made it seem as if time is moving faster out of nowhere. Time is forwarding itself by not letting anything interfere with fate. Madara entwined in fate, was doing everything correctly because of time demanding it. Look up if perception of time makes time move faster. It's a real concept . I'm not saying fluff.

look at my previous comment.

You're using fancy words and concepts to mask a poorly developed theory. It's a manga. Kishi has a week to draw up each chapter. His time is limited to properly pace every chapter perfectly.

You're thinking too much on this.

 

[BerryDerange]

look at my previous comment.

You're using fancy words and concepts to mask a poorly developed theory. It's a manga. Kishi has a week to draw up each chapter. His time is limited to properly pace every chapter perfectly.

You're thinking too much on this.

Oxymoron? How am is this a poorly developed theory, if I am thinking too much into it? And these words and concepts aren't difficult to grasp. Did you search the concept? if not, then quit looking for a scapegoat. Your last statement tells me you're bias. The time to write a chapter has noting to do with the proposition, as I have said kishimoto isn't rushing it on purpose because he wants a rushed story, rather the story looks as it is being rushed because it must is what I'm saying.

In regard to it though, he could have stretched the length of all this to make to seem less rushed. The fact he is squeezing so much content in shows he knows what he wants to write before he writes it, otherwise it would have been prolonged.

 

[BerryDerange]

I don't see how you think it's not rushed but is poor writing. Explain what you meant by "poor writing" for me to understand your point more thoroughly.

 

[BerryDerange]

That honestly makes no sense. If fate exists, everyone's entwined by it, not just the protagonists.

How is time forwarding itself? You need valid examples. Saying that something is rushed isn't an example.

Complex explanations for something simple usually means it's not true.

Btw, this statement was stale and contrived. You were quick to discredit something before understanding it. The bias from you started here

 

[Lightbringer]

Oxymoron? How am is this a poorly developed theory, if I am thinking to much into it? And these words and concepts aren't difficult to grasp. Did you search the concept? if not, then quit looking for a scapegoat. Your last statement tells me you're bias. The time to write a chapter has noting to do with the proposition, as I have said kishimoto isn't rushing it on purpose because he wants a rushed story, rather the story looks as it is being rushed because it must is what I'm saying.

In regard to it though, he could have stretched the length of all this to make to seem less rushed. The fact he is squeezing so much content in shows he knows what he wants to write before he writes it, otherwise it would have been prolonged.

-Your theory isn't clear

-Doesn't provide great evidence

-Subjective and no way to ever prove it to be correct

hence, it is not a good theory



Bias in favor of what? If I understand your position correctly, which is Kishi is cramming tons of information, revelations, and events in his recent chapters in order to speed the manga up, then I disagree with it.

If anything it feels like he's just trying to stretch out the story more

 

[BerryDerange]

-Your theory isn't clear

-Doesn't provide great evidence

-Subjective and no way to ever prove it to be correct

hence, it is not a good theory



Bias in favor of what? If I understand your position correctly, which is Kishi is cramming tons of information, revelations, and events in his recent chapters in order to speed the manga up, then I disagree with it.

If anything it feels like he's just trying to stretch out the story more

While my theory lacks objectivity, your points are moot and banal from rehashing generic statements. Reading your comments and your signature, I can see you like to render yourself the victor. That is not up for you to decide, you're subjective. This shows fallacy in your statement. In how unclear my argument is to you, I'm intrigued how you haven't pointed out any contradictions. There probably is some if you were to find them, but your argument would still be moot with trite responses and their failure to convince me I am wrong. Therefore, I conclude our argument because it is going nowhere with your lack of comprehension and generic statements used.

 

[Lightbringer]

While my theory lacks objectivity, your points are moot and banal from rehashing generic statements. Reading your comments and your signature, I can see you like to render yourself the victor. That is not up for you to decide, you're subjective. This shows fallacy in your statement. In how unclear my argument is to you, I'm intrigued how you haven't pointed out any contradictions. There probably is some if you were to find them, but your argument would still be moot with trite responses and their failure to convince me I am wrong. Therefore, I conclude our argument because it is going nowhere with your lack of comprehension and generic statements used.

fact is I speak 3 languages, and English is my second.

Using big words in order to sound smart is just a way of showing off. I asked you a simple question and you give a complex response.

The point of communication is adequately convey an idea. You refuse to do so. You're entire thread can be simplified in a few sentences, but you unnecessarily overcomplicated it just to sound smart.

 

[BerryDerange]

fact is I speak 3 languages, and English is my second.

Using big words in order to sound smart is just a way of showing off. I asked you a simple question and you give a complex response.

The point of communication is adequately convey an idea. You refuse to do so. You're entire thread can be simplified in a few sentences, but you unnecessarily overcomplicated it just to sound smart.

A word is defined by many words. An idea is a group of ideologies. I explained it. Enough of your badgering

 

[Lightbringer]

A word is defined by many words. An idea is a group of ideologies. I explained it. Enough of your badgering

Now was that too hard?

 

[BerryDerange]

Now was that too hard?

I don't know, you should try it now. Your simplicity is abhorrently pretentious

 

[Lightbringer]

I don't know, you should try it now. Your simplicity is abhorrsively pretentious

That's not even a proper word and you're calling me pretentious

 

[BerryDerange]

That's not even a proper word and you're calling me pretentious

I know what I know, so explain how? I'm not being pretentious at all, it was a mistake. You used the word pretentious wrong. You are attempting to make me seem pretentious by being presumptuous.

 

[Lightbringer]

I know what I know, so explain how? I'm not being pretentious at all, it was a mistake. You used the word pretentious wrong. You are attempting to make me seem pretentious by being presumptuous.

You serious? You're trying to impress everyone by using advanced vocabulary when it is unnecessary.

I can tell when someone is putting on act. That makes you pretentious. So I was using the word right.

You even made up a word. That's a mistake in the sense you have no idea of the meanings behind your own words.

Abhorred and Abhorrible. There is no abhorribly, abhorridley, and especially no abhorrsively.


Anyways I'm done, I don't really care anymore.

 

[BerryDerange]

I fixed it, and you don't know what pretentious means. Good bye