This game doesn't look like a current gen game. It looks like it's just for the PS3 and XBOX 360.
This game doesn't look like a current gen game. It looks like it's just for the PS3 and XBOX 360.
I'm wondering why they thought such a basic looking game is good enough to end the series, lol.Yeah dont know why its only Xbox One and PS4.
I don't really know the technical stuff with graphics but I think there is always room for improvement and if that's the peak, it's trash, lol.i think cell shaded graphics has reached it's peak since last gen
CC2 lazy as always.
This game doesn't look like a current gen game. It looks like it's just for the PS3 and XBOX 360.
So stable frame rates? That doesn't sound like a promising game. Well, I never played a game with 60 fps so I could be wrong but I doubt it's a big deal.
I think the biggest selling point is the 60fps and animations.
If you played the previous gen games you'd know certain characters (*cough* Madara and Susanoo Users) would force frames to drop from 30 to like 15.
Judging by the scale of the boss battles and the in game visuals, it looks like it's running smooth enough to not worry about frame rate being shit.
The gaming versions of Naruto always have bad graphics. Surprised nobodies noticed it until now. They make everything look slightly different than the original in a bad way just like studio Pierrot except worse
The only real difference on the PC is the anti aliasing. Storm graphics are good but not great.Bad graphics???????
WTF it looks amazing on PC(revolutions)
Specially the Ultimates
And why its for PS4 is because of the increaed special effects guys
It needs a better CPU to handle them