You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
Does anyone find these two panels a little contradictory of what we already know?
She ate from the Tree's fruit and received the ability to hold and use chakra, and later on in her life, she had two children that were born with chakra and could potentially do much the same things she could. However, why does it state now that chakra is only hers? I assume that she didn't really want her children to have chakra, but if that is the case, then couldn't she have just either taken it away from them, and or, killed them before they could potentially use it?
This just seems really out of place and got me really confused. I really hope this gets explained.
Thoughts?!