- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
- Messages
- 715
- Reaction score
- 52
... Are both good characters, imo.
Honestly, the weird Obito vs Itachi war going on right now kind of fails to acknowledge that both characters are worthwhile and interesting. I'm a huge fan of both of them, and it pains me to see so many people going at it over which one's better, especially when they kind of fit together as opposites.
Itachi's one of the story's most unique characters. He's a hero playing a villainous role, and not even in the typical way. I've always found it particularly interesting that, although he was literally acting like a villain while being good all along, he played a directly 'villainous' role. What I'm saying is, Itachi ****ed up majorly. Manipulating Sasuke took his brother down a dark, vengeful path, and although it did make him physically stronger, his mental state quickly deteriorated. That being said, he admits that he messed up, and he admits that his plan was a failure. Itachi's a humble character, despite his power, skill, and wisdom.
Obito, on the other hand, is just as arrogant and deluded as the man who trained him. Even when his plan is totally ****ing insane, he says it's best for the world and that he's only trying to save everyone. In reality, his motives are selfish and based around his own despair and ever-growing madness. It's a sort of opposite to Itachi's confession of his own faults. Although Obito was eventually redeemed, his tenure as a villain was defined by his inability to accept the selfishness of his goals, whereas Itachi had no trouble accepting his faults.
Basically, Obito and Itachi are opposites, but both are unique and interesting in their own right. Kishi made a huge mistake when he didn't have them meet up.
... and I know this thread won't do anything to quell the argument, but I figured I might as well post up my own thoughts, being a fan of both characters.
Honestly, the weird Obito vs Itachi war going on right now kind of fails to acknowledge that both characters are worthwhile and interesting. I'm a huge fan of both of them, and it pains me to see so many people going at it over which one's better, especially when they kind of fit together as opposites.
Itachi's one of the story's most unique characters. He's a hero playing a villainous role, and not even in the typical way. I've always found it particularly interesting that, although he was literally acting like a villain while being good all along, he played a directly 'villainous' role. What I'm saying is, Itachi ****ed up majorly. Manipulating Sasuke took his brother down a dark, vengeful path, and although it did make him physically stronger, his mental state quickly deteriorated. That being said, he admits that he messed up, and he admits that his plan was a failure. Itachi's a humble character, despite his power, skill, and wisdom.
Obito, on the other hand, is just as arrogant and deluded as the man who trained him. Even when his plan is totally ****ing insane, he says it's best for the world and that he's only trying to save everyone. In reality, his motives are selfish and based around his own despair and ever-growing madness. It's a sort of opposite to Itachi's confession of his own faults. Although Obito was eventually redeemed, his tenure as a villain was defined by his inability to accept the selfishness of his goals, whereas Itachi had no trouble accepting his faults.
Basically, Obito and Itachi are opposites, but both are unique and interesting in their own right. Kishi made a huge mistake when he didn't have them meet up.
... and I know this thread won't do anything to quell the argument, but I figured I might as well post up my own thoughts, being a fan of both characters.