- Joined
- Jan 26, 2009
- Messages
- 20,753
- Reaction score
- 4,013
1-A fair few from Syria
2-Few other cases
3-Other can't be distinguished
You recognize pictures when it's from Syria and somewhere else (without proof) but when it's from Palestine you don't know because it can't be distinguished. Hmmm i see what you're trying to do here but nobody will buy it.
You must be registered for see links
^ 2012.
You must be registered for see links
This one is from 2008 at least.
Actually that's proof enough as far as internet goes. That news article was from 2012. IN the least that snap has been circulating from that date. So now who is "brainwashed"?
The same "media" is being used by both sides so I'm getting fed up with the argument of "brainwashed by media". It's not like any of us saw it ourselves.
I don't see what makes a news posted on FB more trustworthy for any third party. If people do not buy images stored in internet archived for two years then fine but then do not post images and expect other people to buy it from even less authentic sources. A news paper at least can be held accountable for fake.
Not saying deaths are not real in Gaza but it's clear that they are trying to make up with their lack of firepower with media war and they are not hesitating to use fake images for that.
Edit: I didn't try to trace others for images in general were too gruesome for me and I didn't feel like it. Besides too violent images cannot be linked here as it's a child friendly site. Do your HW yourself for the rest.
Last edited:
