Isn't Madara essentially correct from a purely philosophical point of view?

htmwall

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
3,892
Reaction score
394
The Indians got rid of one enemy before turning inwards on themselves. Muslim vs Hindu no? Its just human nature. How can you fight against human nature without changing humans. Humans can't change on their own not truly, they can as you said bury hate/prejudice deep down inside themselves but its not gone its just suppressed.

Really the sages attempt to create a race of "connected" individuals was doomed to fail before it began, the limited nature of the number of people he could teach (or gift) within his chakra was always going to create a segregation in society between those that have and those that do not have. Not to mention the scale of the experiment was terrible.

A better idea would have been to create an ORDER of peace. An organization capable of mediating and trying its hardest to control human nature. IE basically jedi knights, instead of giving chakra to anyone, he should have gathered like minded individuals that wanted peace for the future to pass on his and their dream to future guardians alongside that power of chakra. But the fact that Chakra became inheritable was terrible he should have found a way to limit it for people to pass on the chakra voluntary to people who were of a similar nature rather than those that are power hungry for powers sake. By keeping his chakra divisions small he could retain potency but also keep the numbers small. They could stop wars instead of joining them.

Ultimately he just messed up and is responsible for even more devastating wars that not only kill more people but destroy the landscape when they happen...
actually there was a selected individuals that the sage intrusted a great amount of power to,which are the bijuus.the jinchuurikis and their bijuus,if combined together in one organisation they can maintain peace eternally.but the bijuus got seperated by the humans and used as tools for wars.
if the new jichuurikis create such an organisation,they can maintain peace by using their power to force the fighting countries into resolving their issues through talking and arrangments something like in real world UNSC(without the biased veto).
 

Rokudaime Hokage Naruto

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
2,615
Reaction score
292
Depends what you believe. If you believe it is better to have peace than free will then yes Madara is correct. But if like me you believe free will is better then Naruto is right.
 

SixPathsOfTobi

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
1,153
Reaction score
46
Depends what you believe. If you believe it is better to have peace than free will then yes Madara is correct. But if like me you believe free will is better then Naruto is right.

Madara's option is equal to just blowing up the planet with everyone on it.. Everyone will be robotic pawns in the game of madara.
 

UnrealSoul

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
933
Reaction score
49
Madara's option is equal to just blowing up the planet with everyone on it.. Everyone will be robotic pawns in the game of madara.

Because Madara has a good point that people will continue to war no matter what. It doesn't matter if naruto becomes hokage as long as man lives he will want more from life. Everyone has ambitions, danzo is an example of this. You can't maintain peace without power but at the same time too much power creates an opposing power in which brings war.

Life is just a fcked up cycle...
 
Top