- Joined
- Jan 14, 2012
- Messages
- 5,589
- Reaction score
- 612
Some people think danzo made the right choice of killing the whole uchiha clan just because they were threat to konoha.
But i think hiruzen was more correct in this situation. I mean come on, All of the conflicts were just due to a bit of misunderstanding. Danzo and the others thought Uchiha had something to do with kyuubi attack and uchiha clan were annoyed, as they were excluded from konoha .
I think few negotiations would have prevented the massacre . As we know itachi figured out obito/tobi did the kyuubi attack on konoha so he could have told this to everyone and then konoha would have got rid of him AND if a uchiha would have done it , it would have generated trust between konoha and uchihas which would have been even better.
But thats just my opinion...
So what do you think was correct justice for you, Danzo's method or hiruzen's ?
But i think hiruzen was more correct in this situation. I mean come on, All of the conflicts were just due to a bit of misunderstanding. Danzo and the others thought Uchiha had something to do with kyuubi attack and uchiha clan were annoyed, as they were excluded from konoha .
I think few negotiations would have prevented the massacre . As we know itachi figured out obito/tobi did the kyuubi attack on konoha so he could have told this to everyone and then konoha would have got rid of him AND if a uchiha would have done it , it would have generated trust between konoha and uchihas which would have been even better.
But thats just my opinion...
So what do you think was correct justice for you, Danzo's method or hiruzen's ?