Is It Okay to Not Accept Homosexuality

[WolfHaley]

Too bad contraceptives don't exist right?

That doesn't change the fact that incest can result in some harmful mutations. That's like saying "Killing someone with a gun isn't bad because bulletproof vests exist."

 

[ComplexCity]

No it can't, seeing as how there is nothing exclusively or specifically harmful about homosexuality.

With incest, you have weakened genes which can result in harmful mutations that could harm the resulting baby.

You just said you cant help who you are attracted to, but you can control the action. I responded you can say the same about homosexuality

What does this post have to do with that?

 

[ComplexCity]

That doesn't change the fact that incest can result in some harmful mutations. That's like saying "Killing someone with a gun isn't bad because bulletproof vests exist."

So can accidental pregnancies, they cause abortions and unborn kids which can be as equally bad. Homosexuals can't even reproduce, something that is a human function

 

[WolfHaley]

You just said you cant help who you are attracted to, but you can control the action. I responded you can say the same about homosexuality

What does this post have to do with that?

I guess I have to make an entire detailed post because you still don't understand.

It's not right to discriminate against someone for something they can't control. You shouldn't discriminate someone for being sexually attracted to their own gender, or to a family member, because that's something they can't help, they didn't choose to be sexually attracted to what they are attracted to.

However, discriminating against someone because they had *** with family member, while not necessarily wrong or right, isn't as bad as discriminating against someone who engages in homosexual acts. The reason for this is that acts of incest can result in a baby with harmful mutations. Homosexual acts don't cause any kind of inherent harm that is exclusive to homosexual acts, or any kind of harm that happens with homosexual acts vastly more than other *** acts like harmful mutations is with acts of incest.

You could say things like "Well what if two homosexual brothers have acts of incest, or two homosexual women, there is no baby, so no harmful mutations, so why is it wrong?" Well that's because we have evolved to avoid incest. We are evolved to embrace traits that help, and avoid traits that harm, and acts of incest cause harm, so we avoid it completely.

 

[ComplexCity]

I guess I have to make an entire detailed post because you still don't understand.

It's not right to discriminate against someone for something they can't control. You shouldn't discriminate someone for being sexually attracted to their own gender, or to a family member, because that's something they can't help, they didn't choose to be sexually attracted to what they are attracted to.

However, discriminating against someone because they had *** with family member, while not necessarily wrong or right, isn't as bad as discriminating against someone who engages in homosexual acts. The reason for this is that acts of incest can result in a baby with harmful mutations. Homosexual acts don't cause any kind of inherent harm that is exclusive to homosexual acts, or any kind of harm that happens with homosexual acts vastly more than other *** acts like harmful mutations is with acts of incest.

You could say things like "Well what if two homosexual brothers have acts of incest, or two homosexual women, there is no baby, so no harmful mutations, so why is it wrong?" Well that's because we have evolved to avoid incest. We are evolved to embrace traits that help, and avoid traits that harm, and acts of incest cause harm, so we avoid it completely.

You are the same guy who basically said you can walk into another atmosphere. I digress

 

[TaekesiLegende]

Yes. It is perfectly fine, morally adequate and I see absolutely no inadequacies with the concept, declining homosexuality as a norm is perfectly moral.

 

[WolfHaley]

You are the same guy who basically said you can walk into another atmosphere. I digress

That's not what I said. And that has nothing to do with this. Assuming that I'm wrong in this argument because I was potentially wrong in another is a fallacy and signals that you can't counter what I said. You lose.

Besides, if you really wanna go back to that shit, tell me the manga doesn't say Toad Mountain has a different atmosphere than Konoha, and that there's a route that you can walk on to reach the Toad Mountain

 

[ComplexCity]

That's not what I said. And that has nothing to do with this. Assuming that I'm wrong in this argument because I was potentially wrong in another is a fallacy and signals that you can't counter what I said. You lose.

You have poor comprehension as that's not what I am referring to. But whatever floats your boat, you're talking in circles like you were in le other thread. As I said I digress, this thread will be closed or deleted soon =P

 

[WolfHaley]

You have poor comprehension as that's not what I am referring to. But whatever floats your boat, you're talking in circles like you were in le other thread. As I said I digress, this thread will be closed or deleted soon =P

All I hear is "I can't actually counter what you're saying so I'm gonna say bullshit." There's no part of that post that is part of my argument that I didn't say before.

 

[ComplexCity]

All I hear is "I can't actually counter what you're saying so I'm gonna say bullshit." There's no part of that post that is part of my argument that I didn't say before.

I could if I wanted to you've already contradicted yourself and then transmodified your argument to try establish a valid point. Which I still see is absent. I am absconding not because I cannot refute but because debating is futile on NB, you can take that however you like. Duecues

 

[WolfHaley]

I could if I wanted to you've already contradicted yourself and then transmodified your argument to try establish a valid point. Which I still see is absent. I am absconding not because I cannot refute but because debating is futile on NB, you can take that however you like. Duecues

Where did I contradict myself?