- Joined
- Jun 8, 2013
- Messages
- 15,769
- Reaction score
- 1,221
I was referring to the part where you said that homosexuals can't make a family.
Their children must have been adopted, am I right? That doesn't make a family.
I was referring to the part where you said that homosexuals can't make a family.
Their children must have been adopted, am I right? That doesn't make a family.
Yes it is. Literally nothing you can say to prove otherwise.
''any group of persons closely related by blood, as parents, children, uncles, aunts, and cousins.''
Family definition. Read it up.
Get your archaic, bootleg definition outta here
fam·i·ly
ˈfam(ə)lē/Submit
noun
1.
a group consisting of parents and children living together in a household.
That ain't the only definitions. Family ain't just about blood. Anyone with half a brain can Tell you that.
Social reproduction
One of the primary functions of the family involves providing a framework for the production and reproduction of persons, biologically and/or socially. This can occur through the sharing of material substances (such as food); the giving and receiving of care and nurture (nurture kinship); jural rights and obligations; and moral and sentimental ties.[1][2] Thus, one's experience of one's family shifts over time. From the perspective of children, the family is a "family of orientation": the family serves to locate children socially and plays a major role in their enculturation and socialization.[3] From the point of view of the parent(s), the family is a "family of procreation," the goal of which is to produce and enculturate and socialize children.[4] However, producing children is not the only function of the family; in societies with a sexual division of labor, marriage, and the resulting relationship between two people, it is necessary for the formation of an economically productive household.[5][6][7]
No, that's just a definition that can be recognized in countries that gay marriage is legal at. The social definition itself does not recognize the definition, as it is not a social production.
Like I said, read it up.
Nah, you just need to catch up to modern times.
It's got nothing to do with modern times or conservative. Homosexuality is universally, socially, biologically unacceptable. This is why majority of countries do not accept it. This is why homosexuals are abused physically and mentally in developed and developing nations.
Congress are going to veto the supreme court for it:You must be registered for see links
Okay, Mr. democratic? :lol
Nah, it's really not. Majority of countries don't accept it cuz the world is full of dicks.
Yes, you are right and everyone else is wrong. :lol Whatever helps sleep at night.
Oh and their views are right because you say so? The fact that you think they're intolerant, hateful, murderous, violent views are right says a lot about you.