all the same, Sasuke's Rinnegan being a new acquisition was and still is no excuse. If it wasn't an issue for anyone when they fought Madara, then there shouldn't be any reason whatsoever to try attributing his lack of contribution to the fight against Kaguya. There was a cardinal rule of fighting that Zabuza mentioned in the Land of Waves Arc, and it states that a person would be foolish to repeatedly use their absolute best move against the same person; especially in 1 fight. The bottom line is that Sasuke's lack of substance boils down to his failure in realizing this. If he knew any better, he would've realized how pointless it was trying to engage Kaguya in such close range with any kind of Susano'o the first time she busted it. Kakashi barely had his for 5mins and judging from his performance, he apparently learned plenty from Sasuke screwing up and did what he did w/o a Rinnegan. It really just boils down to Kakashi proving he could do better than Sasuke at virtually anything if he were to essentially have the same tools to work with because his tactics were far better. if you spent nearly as much effort reading my post correctly as you did trying to turn this into a tier argument and using caps, you'd realize my case was about who performed better than in that fight who and not who is above who on some power tier.
oh pls. Given the amount of times Sasuke used any version of his Susano'o and Rinnegan in that fight alone, who are you trying to b.s. with this garbage about how Sasuke was intentionally holding back?
you can believe w/e you want with everything you got, it won't change what actually happened. Naruto tore her arm off while Sasuke had to get bailed out by somebody practically most of the time in that fight. That's not an equal performance by any stretch of the imagination, especially because Naruto showed how well he could at least hold his own against her while Sasuke kept getting clowned. Those are facts and not beliefs.