[Discussion] How to beat cancer(and any disease)

[Yubel]

1. So in other words you try to counter my point that everyone is genetically predisposed to cancer by: not only providing only one type of cancer, but said one type of cancer already has 5-10% genetic predisposition.You do realize there are many different types of cancer, right? You didn't get that far in your understanding of cancer, huh?

No, I do not "spew crap that is blatantly false". Everything so far has been out of Biology textbooks that professors teach university students in order to become accomplished scientists. They would never teach us material that would directly hinder scientific progress. Think on this. Would I actually intentionally feed you and others false information about disease and cancer? Do I actually have an ulterior motive on this?

3. So despite the 67.9% of funding going to Research, we should overlook Big Pharma's efforts and completely stop the industry? Because I realize Big Pharma can be a corporate *******, but it's not a complete corporate *******. That title goes to Koch Industries. Koch Industries likes to spend money against scientists' 99% acknowledgement of a certain environmental phenomenon that would make them lose sales were government to act, unlike Big Pharma which uses their research money to understand more about disease and immunity. Think how much money that went into that research. Now think how modern medicine would turn out if there was no scientific research granted. That's right, we would be worse off as a society, costs or no costs.

4. Said free vaccines are free for citizens and free for US and First-World vaccines exported to said third-world countries, like Tetanus Pertussis. Some countries do not want First-World medicine because they are skeptical of our doctors and their "ulterior motives" to vaccinating third-world citizens.

It's really, really not that hard to research. You should really try and understand information even if it goes against your preconceived belief. Yeah, Big Pharma is a nasty industry, but it also does good too. NOBODY should have the thought of shutting down research just because of the industry that funds it. It is backwards thinking

I wasn't ignoring that there are other forms of cancer. I was simply proving you wrong with the easiest example without saying too much.

I don't think you understand my view, if for example only 5-10% of breast cancer is hereditary and people with a predisposition don't always get it then it means the majority of the cause are outside factors in our environment. I'm merely using breast cancer to illustrate my point. What else could cause cancer? Uh, tobacco, drugs, alcohol, radiation, toxic chemicals in the air we breathe in all day, our diet etc.

Basically unhealthy lifestyle coupled with a toxic environment, you can look major industries as the main culprit. Why? Because profit comes before sustainability and health. So when I'm talking about changing the system, I'm not just looking at Big Pharma, to say corruption is ok because it could be worse is pretty truncated. The monetary system needs to go for us to create real cures and it will.
We promote infinite consumption on a planet with finite resources, as soon as most jobs get automated money will become obsolete.