gullagullagulla
Member
335 posts
27 reactions
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2012
- Messages
- 335
- Status
- Activity Streak
I'm just gonna go ahead and copy-paste a comment I made on a thread a while ago, which I got no responses to.
I don't even understand how these "Sage is an Uzumaki" threads make any sense. When has it ever been stated that the Uzumaki clan even EXISTED during the Sage's time?? The Uchiha Clan DESCENDED from his older son, the Senju Clan DESCENDED from his younger son. i.e, they didn't exist beforehand. It has been stated that the Uzumaki Clan are distant RELATIVES of the Senju... implying that the Senju came first. It's illogical to say that the Sage was an Uzumaki. They descended from him, distantly. There were no "Uzumakis" during his time.
If I'm just totally missing something and the idea that the Sage was an Uzumaki can absolutely be explained using facts from the manga, then someone please enlighten me. I'm so willing to admit that I'm wrong, but right now I've seen nothing that really concretely explains the logic behind this idea.
I don't even understand how these "Sage is an Uzumaki" threads make any sense. When has it ever been stated that the Uzumaki clan even EXISTED during the Sage's time?? The Uchiha Clan DESCENDED from his older son, the Senju Clan DESCENDED from his younger son. i.e, they didn't exist beforehand. It has been stated that the Uzumaki Clan are distant RELATIVES of the Senju... implying that the Senju came first. It's illogical to say that the Sage was an Uzumaki. They descended from him, distantly. There were no "Uzumakis" during his time.
If I'm just totally missing something and the idea that the Sage was an Uzumaki can absolutely be explained using facts from the manga, then someone please enlighten me. I'm so willing to admit that I'm wrong, but right now I've seen nothing that really concretely explains the logic behind this idea.

