He is not saying he knows history, he says that what we've learned is not trustable.
Tho, calling ppl"true thinkers and truth teller" just becuz they agree with him is not logical.
And,questioning our knowledge is not a bad thing, it leads to learn new things, doesn't it?
Actually he does. When you claim that 90% of history are lies and then describe people who agree with you as "truth tellers" and "true thinkers", then yeah then you're implying you know history. Otherwise making such claims while knowing nothing is preposterous and that is exactly the problem here.
And yeah questioning is not automatically a good thing. Questioning just for the sake of questioning is pointless. There has to be a reason and a purpose. Otherwise it's like driving randomly around in your car. You don't know why you got into the car, you don't know where you are going, you're just riding around wasting your time, money and whatnot. Referring again to the Flat-Earth comparison. They have no reason to question the shape of the Earth, it will change absolutely nothing and the evidence against it is overwhelming, but still they go on about it. Why? Because they want to be special, they want to be different and want to show that to everyone. The factual truth is not important. It might be cute with little children, but when it concerns adults such behavior is cancerous as it's not rational and when people are being irrational, you can't deal with them.
This is biggest irony of this all. This is why we have historians, to counterbalance people like him as they are the ones who are a threat to how we remember history. They screw around, have no awareness about the subtleties and complexities involving history whatsoever, but then start spreading complete, baseless nonsense while pretending they somehow know everything about it while it's obvious they do not.
And when someone specifically asked in this thread where he got this from, he just gave a BS answer that pretty much came down to that he doesn't know. He made it up.
