I don't know why you think it's a symbol of modesty, when you're oppressing yourself by covering natural things.
It's a gamble. You marry someone you have no idea what they look like. On the first night of marriage a guy removes the woman's coverage and sees a Princess Fiona in her ogre form.
It is allowed to take a look at the girl you're gonna marry.
From al-Mugheerah ibn Shu’bah: “I proposed marriage to a woman, and the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: ‘Have you seen her?’ I said, ‘No.’ He said, ‘Look at her, because it is more fitting that love and compatibility be established between you.’” According to another report: “So he did that, and he married her and mentioned that they got along.” (Reported by al-Daaraqutni, 3/252 (31, 32); Ibn Maajah, 1/574)
Al-Shaafa’i (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “If he wants to marry a woman, he is not allowed to see her without a headcover. He may look at her face and hands when she is covered, with or without her permission. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): ‘… and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent…’ [al-Noor 24:31]. He said: ‘The face and hands.’” (al-Haawi al-Kabeer, 9/34).
Imaam al-Nawawi said in Rawdat al-Taalibeen wa ‘Umdat al-Mufteen (7, 19-20): “When (a man) wants to marry (a woman), it is preferable (mustahabb) for him to look at her so that he will have no regrets.
Abu Haneefah permitted looking at the feet as well as the face and hands. (Bidaayah al-Mujtahid wa Nihayyat al-Muqtasid, 3/10)
From the above, it is clear that the majority of scholars say that a man is allowed to look at his fiancée’s face and hands, because the face indicates beauty or ugliness, and the hands indicate the slimness or plumpness (literally, ‘fertility’) of the body.
Abu’l-Faraj al-Maqdisi said: “There is no dispute among the scholars that he is permitted to look at the face.. the focus of beauty and the place at which one looks.”
You must be registered for see links
No gamble there.
However:
It was narrated from Abu Hurayrah that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “A woman may be married for four reasons: her wealth, her lineage, her beauty and her religious commitment. Choose the one who is religious, may your hands be rubbed with dust [i.e., may you prosper].”
(Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 4802; Muslim, 1466).
Why would you even cover your naturally given properties. Sure you cover your genitals,
and you would cover your arms and legs for protecting yourself from the environment. Why would you though cover the portions of your body that are completely unnecessary, like your head, face, and hair?
First you complain why people have to cover their bodies, then you give examples answering your own question.
You think it's unnecessary, but it does serve its societal purpose.
Most Islamic women do that because
Because you met all of them and they told you, right?
1. Society's laws have them do so
2. Their husband or family wants them to do so
3. Religion sees Women as an inferior species than men, so they have women cover themselves up
Apparently it didn't occur to you that maybe God expects them to do so and they believe in that.
You should elaborate on your 3rd point...
Yeah she comes from a christian family, and?
But aren't you setting up yourself as an object that needs to be hidden that badly and suggesting anything less is immodest and asking for trouble?
No.
By that logic, all of us wearing clothes are objects...
Especially that men in islam also have a dress code, which people often forget. Surah An-Nur, verse 30:v
"Tell the believing men to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts. That is purer for them. Indeed, Allah is Acquainted with what they do."
You must be registered for see links
More rulings for men here:
The basic principle concerning everything that is worn is that it is halaal and permissible, except for that concerning which there is a text to state that it is haraam, such as silk for males, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “These two [gold and silk] are forbidden for the males of my ummah and permissible for the females.” Narrated by Ibn Maajah, 3640; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Ibn Maajah. Similarly it is not permissible to wear the skin of a dead animal (one that has died of natural causes) unless it has been tanned. With regard to wearing clothes made of wool, goat hair and camel hair, these are pure and permissible.
It is not permissible to wear thin or see-through clothing that does not conceal the ‘awrah.
It is haraam to imitate the mushrikeen and kuffaar in their manner of dress, so it is not permissible to wear clothing that is unique to the kuffaar.
It is haraam for women to imitate men and men to imitate women in the way they dress, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) cursed the men who imitate women and the women who imitate men.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 5546.
It is haraam for the Muslim man to let any garment he wears hang down beneath his ankles (an action known as isbaal); the limit for any garment is the ankles.
It is haraam to wear garments of fame and vanity, which means a garment that stands out from others so that people will look at the wearer and he will become known for it.
You must be registered for see links
Apparently, men are oppressed objects too, for they can't wear whatever they want, either.
Of course I agree with some other points.
A hijab in itself doesn't necessarily imply piety, but in general it's a good indicator of being religious. Of course, sadly, I've seen women wearing the hijab in public but posting selfies without it online. Sometimes girls just wear it out of fashion and post selfies with it...
Also, a man may treat women as objects regardless them wearing hijab. But a man can respect women in general, whether they wear the hijab or not. It's rather subjective. Now of course from a religious pov, just because some men are disrespectful, it doesn't exempt women from their own religious responsibility to cover the required parts.