Whoops. Ephemeral would do then.
Lmaooo, it's more interesting to debate for the character with low chances of winning then to always debate the most obvious like you do. Otherwise VS threads would be pointless since everyone has the same common opinion.
No it's not, because most of the time if they have a low chance of winning, inaccurate arguments will be brought up. Arguments that either downplay the opposition or ignore parts of their abilities or the limitations of the character who is the clear winner. The only thing that'd actually be good to debate is a match that can go either way.
Although I agree to an extent, one way to find out match-ups that can go either way is through differing opinions. People might be under the common opinion that x beats y and vs thread ends at 10 replies everyone saying x wins. Someday scrub1 says y beats x and ends up having a viable argument as to how he beats him, some change opinion to y beats x while others still think x beats y. Noamsaiyan? I've been debating characters that are unlikely to win lately and I have changed some opinions of other's because at times, things can be overlooked and the 'unlikely' may end up being right. I find it pretty interesting since it seems everybody copies the opinions of other member's lately, in specific, your opinions (not that they are always wrong).
