General Football Debates!
- Thread starter Escorpiius
- Start date
The Sach
Active member
Awards
This guy needs some chill pills. I love United a lot, but even I wasn't that much furious when we ended up 7th under Moyes.XD
^This is so true, tbh. Players sacked Mou is the real truth out there.
Sacking Mou wasn't good decision, imo. Something needed to be done, but that doesn't mean that you have to either sack a manager or let the players go. In fact, if you look at Chelsea's performance, you will observe that some of the matches were unlucky defeats and in few others, mistakes from few players cost them dearly.
Problem with Chelsea higher ups is, they never tried to intervene when things went wrong between Jose and Chelsea players. They were just standing there and watching it getting worse. Remember Keane vs Fergie saga from way back?? Fergie and Gill did cleared up the stuff and sold only that player which caused the problem. Fergie had full support from Gill over the course of years and Fergie in turn never tried to take on 'the entire team'. He maintain his calm and composure unlike Mou.
It is Mou's fault as well, to be honest. His comments like 'I have nothing to say' or the way he blamed referees after every match or his behavior in general, isn't something manager of his caliber or status should do. One can counter that by stating that, it's Mou for you and that's why Chelsea board is the main component at fault here.
When you appoint a manager like Mou and on top of that if he was manager under you for one term before(that too really celebrated one), then you need to have proper ideas and plans.
This is how Chelsea was supposed to play and its how they play with the calibre of their players, the Chelsea until now was filled with players trying to sack their coach in the most classic way players do...
.