Of course " coloured is archaic and now replaced with " people/person of colour". But you forget that this conversation started when you pretended that you did not know the term "person of colour" and asked someone "who is colourless then". To which I pointed you to Urban dictionary.
Then you took offence that someone defined that, to which I pointed that it was result of the phrase "people of colour".
To which you replied it was an American thing To which I pointed to British uses of it. And Britain does use the phrase " people of colour"
"
It’s an understatement to say that over the past eight years, people of colour in this country have had it rough. We turn on the news to hear the dog-whistle racism of Boris Johnson, with high-ranking Tories long invoking dehumanising imagery of
You must be registered for see links
. Austerity is
You must be registered for see links
, while policies have been explicitly designed to create a “hostile environment” for migrants and black and minority ethnic (BAME) people living in Britain. "
-
You must be registered for see links
, The Guardian.
You must be registered for see links
Your newspapers don't seem to have gotten that memo you are trying to sell me.
Besides articles like this
You must be registered for see links
tell that the phrase is in use in UK.
Right now you are just chasing your own tail, you know. & You walked right in to it.
If you had a point back there, you need to use a different approach.