Not sure- I hear Mystique is a bisexual and the scene depicts a god choking a person who belongs to LGBT community, so it's a case of homophobia.3. I think the poster is racist. It depicts the violence between colored people. #bluelivesmatter :sparks:
Do you understand the meaning of the term "selective outrage" to comment whether it's a finest example or not? A group that's literally meant to see interest of a particular group is supposed to voice their opinion in interest of that group only.So the poster is bad because a woman from x men is getting her ass whooped? This is a action movie not spongebob.If this was wolverine or anyone who is a male no one would care at all. The poster isn't bad at all. It has nothing to do with domestic violence
It is selective outrage at its finest
Where is the outrage for supporting guns
You must be registered for see images
Great. Meet me in 5 mins and let's start ripping them off the walls.Be my guest and remove all such imagery from the bill boards.
@bold: lolwut?Ninjas just don't try to kill each other, they are actually able to kill them but it would be odd if out of whole Naruto series, they decide to put Oobito's blood bath after Rin's death or a half cut Tusnade on the Billboard or Hinata with her floating boobs. What next since there are porn movies too, do you think it's fine to put a scene for there on one of such boards?
And from where did you conclude this was a matter of opinions? The point is everyone should know what they're talking about. Are you actually denying this? I am well aware of what the opposing side is saying, it's just that I find their position resting in ignorance, therefore I tell them to read the synopsis of the movie, check who the mc is and so on - study the context.Just because you do not want to see beyond your opinion, it doesn't mean I do not think before I talk. Throw some ink on paper and show the spot to different people asking them what do they see in that. They will come up with different descriptions. Sometimes there are no right or wrong answers and at other times you can argue why it's not bad. But apparently you can be patient when it comes to defending religious dogmas no matter how silly, but when it comes to feminists issues you cannot simply keep it to respectful disagreement.
Advertisement of alchohol and cigaretes is forbbiden where I'm at too, but there's a difference between promoting and advertising. Promotion, in the sense I'm using the word, is reffering to any form of encouragement of a certain thing. ***, drugs, alchohol and the whole glamorous "we live for the night" lifestyle is openly promoted everywhere - movies, tv shows, music - everything. "Should we censor all that while we're on our crusade against violent imaginery as well?" was my point.You are most welcome. And yes promotion of alcohol, drugs, cigarettes via advertising or billboards is prohibited here and I will be happy if they stop serialization on it too. So exactly what's your point?
You forget that we are talking about advertisement here and this promotion too is on billboard. Plus "desensitize" is an established phenomena:Advertisement of alchohol and cigaretes is forbbiden where I'm at too, but there's a difference between promoting and advertising. Promotion, in the sense I'm using the word, is reffering to any form of encouragement of a certain thing. ***, drugs, alchohol and the whole glamorous "we live for the night" lifestyle is openly promoted everywhere - movies, tv shows, music - everything. "Should we censor all that while we're on our crusade against violent imaginery as well?" was my point.
Removing that which is percieved as negative from public life (though to which extent this should go?), that was my point. I already said it multiple times in my replies directly to you so idk why you didn't understand it the first few times I said it.
Good.Great. Meet me in 5 mins and let's start ripping them off the walls.
Just your opinion and I have mine. We disagree.@bold: lolwut?
If I were Kishi I'd absolutely, no doubt, put Obito's bloody scene on the volume cover because it shows the dramatic change in his character. It's an ultimate defining moment in his life that would hunt him for, what 20 years, before Naruto talks him back to the light. Tsunade and Hinata I don't see a point in putting on a billboard (unless you want fan service ofc) as they're side characters that are totally irrelevant on the grand scheme of things.
Mystique on the other hand is a central character of the triology. Putting here there is thus an equivalent of putting a pinched Naruto on a poster. (Something that has been done to death and noone ever complained.)
An opinion is an expression of a person's feelings or emotions along with facts (or without them). The moment you decided to comment on the people or their thinking ability instead of limiting yourself to addressing their argument, your post was reduced to an opinion. Similarly when the person/s who objected to it gave her/her/their opinion/s.And from where did you conclude this was a matter of opinions? The point is everyone should know what they're talking about. Are you actually denying this? I am well aware of what the opposing side is saying, it's just that I find their position resting in ignorance, therefore I tell them to read the synopsis of the movie, check who the mc is and so on - study the context.
Yes thanks for accepting that you came in to comment with a pre existing bias. ^_^The only thing disrespectful that I said was the original post in which I said "crappy femminists strike again" or something like that, and it wasn't really a part of a discussion and definitelly not a serious argument. Just a one-liner that expresses my disdain for what I percieve to be a case of femi-nazism (as they call it) due to the fact that noone had to apologize when guys were getting beat up.
Telling me to think before I talk and I return the sentiment.As soon as you engaged me in a discussion I changed the tone to be appropriate.
@bold: theres no difference, its two ways of saying the same thingAdvertisement of alchohol and cigaretes is forbbiden where I'm at too, but there's a difference between promoting and advertising. Promotion, in the sense I'm using the word, is reffering to any form of encouragement of a certain thing. ***, drugs, alchohol and the whole glamorous "we live for the night" lifestyle is openly promoted everywhere - movies, tv shows, music - everything. "Should we censor all that while we're on our crusade against violent imaginery as well?" was my point.
Removing that which is percieved as negative from public life (though to which extent this should go?), that was my point. I already said it multiple times in my replies directly to you so idk why you didn't understand it the first few times I said it.
Yes I do. Do you?Do you understand the meaning of the term "selective outrage" to comment whether it's a finest example or not? A group that's literally meant to see interest of a particular group is supposed to voice their opinion in interest of that group only.
Hmmm let's me see because people die every freaking day due to gun violence. Why support the use of guns as if its some toy. It is a wepon to kill. But noooooooo mystique getting choked is so heartbreakingAnd why there should be an outrage for supporting guns? What if the people objecting here, do support guns to begin with?
:kk:Same as above- although this one is even more complicated- I'm sure many of the people who used to have such a rope for dealing with their black saves would see no problem in removing that reminder of the past and love to follow recent example of Turkey ( denial of Armenian genocide) . On the other hand I suspect the outrage would come from 'Black' population for such attempts. Either way it's up to the people who think it may have negative impact to raise their voice.
Then why don't you put the mirror away and you won't see them.Yes I do. Do you?
Because what I see are people grasping for dear life on bs. Thank you
If you want to argue over gun violence find AimC64. I don't give a shit. People will find something else to kill or make illegal ones. We already have strict enough gun laws in my country so do no talk as if you are raising a universal issue either.Hmmm let's me see because people die every freaking day due to gun violence. Why support the use of guns as if its some toy. It is a wepon to kill. But noooooooo mystique getting choked is so heartbreaking
Then don't.I can't Lol
How eloquent!:kk:
What makes you think I need your permission to believe whatever I want to? Just stick to your own opinion.I'm not going to argue with you Ira. Believe whatever your heart desires. The poster wasn't bad point blank
You were the one who would have been only too happy to throw kisses on such a poster two year ago, now you are demanding the feminists to outrage over it as if it's a feminists issue. smhLmao @ that 2yr old reference girl bye
"advertising@bold: theres no difference, its two ways of saying the same thing
The Obito part sure, just as it is yours so what kind of response is that?Just your opinion.
Except I wasn't talking about this debate but wether the poster promotes violence against women. (The topic of this discussion basically.) The answer to this is no because the only way you could reach the conclusion "yes" is by ignoring the context of the poster (ie the very film it promotes). Since checking out what the poster is about (the movie) will give one the proper insight and show that the film is simply portraying an mc in a pinch (an old cliff hanger technique of drawing audience in) the proper answer is "no".An opinion is an expression of a person's feelings or emotions along with facts. The moment you decided to comment on the people and their thinking ability instead of limiting yourself to their argument your post was reduced to just an opinion. Similarly when the person/s who objected to it gave her/her/their opinion/s.
Fox didn't demand factual proof either but decided to end the matter wish a cursory apology to such an opinion to avoid getting it more dragged.
So yea it's all about opinions.
You seem awfully happy. .-.Yes thanks for accepting that you came in to comment with a pre existing bias.
The "think before you talk" part wasn't directed to you as in you personally, but the group that holds the view that the poster is a promotion of violence against women. (I said specifically that "you" is there for the sake of the argument.)Telling me to think before I talk and I return the sentiment.
"advertising
ˈadvətʌɪzɪŋ/
noun
the activity or profession of producing advertisements for commercial products or services."
"promote
prəˈməʊt
verb
gerund or present participle: promoting
1.
support or actively encourage (a cause, venture, etc.); "
Advertising is a marketing concept while promotion of something isn't tied solely to marketing. Promoting something simply means the encouragement of that something. For example, it's illegal to advertise weed on national TV, but noone will arrest you for encouraging your friends to try a smoke.
The Obito part sure, just as it is yours so what kind of response is that?
The Mystique part is a fact. Stone-cold fact. She played a big role in each movie. She influenced the events of the whole triology on a massive scale. (Dystopian future *wink* *wink*) She still playes a huge role in fighting the Apocalypse.
Except I wasn't talking about this debate but wether the poster promotes violence against women. (The topic of this discussion basically.) The answer to this is no because the only way you could reach the conclusion "yes" is by ignoring the context of the poster (ie the very film it promotes). Since checking out what the poster is about (the movie) will give one the proper insight and show that the film is simply portraying an mc in a pinch (an old cliff hanger technique of drawing audience in) the proper answer is "no".
Now, I hear you saying "omg this guy is so dense, the context is up for interpretation therefore this whole things is a matter of subjective opinions -.-" ", to which I say: the context easily deduced from multiple things, first being the question of what is the purpose of a billboard in a first place.
The answer to this is to promote a movie. A movie - a product. Nothing more nothing else. It is nothing more but a pointer to the ideas present in the movie, so in a nutshell the billboard promotes the movie which promotes certain ideas, therefore the only ideas a billboard can be used to promote are the ones present in the movie (indirect promotion).
So all that matters is what the movie promotes. In this case the question is "does the movie promote violence against women?". The answer to that is a clear "no" until someone can give me material that actually does this.
You seem awfully happy. .-.
What would that pre-existing bias mean, may I ask? I simply posted my stance on the topic (albeit in a poor and unconstructive manner) before actually getting into a discussion. What part of that is bias? Obviously we represent opposing positions on this matter, therefore we're having this discussion. You're my opponet and I am yours. I simply made a case and I'm now defending it while trying to refute yours as are you.
What part of this is supposed to be a negative thing? It's simply what a debate is.
The "think before you talk" part wasn't directed to you as in you personally, but the group that holds the view that the poster is a promotion of violence against women. (I said specifically that "you" is there for the sake of the argument.)
Advertise the movie.What do you think billboards was being used for?
The reason I pasted dictionary definitions is to make the context in which I use those words clear. The person who I responded to said the words mean the same thing and I proved they don't as there are different definitions depending on the context in which they are being used.Exactly what do you think pasting dictionary explanation of the word advertising would accomplish?
We're talking about wether the poster promotes violence against women (a negative behaviour rather than a product), to which I say a clear "no". Atleast that's what I'm talking about.Would it somehow change the fact that we are talking about promotional advertisement here?
I thought this thread is about femminist circles boycotting Fox for supposedly promoting violence against women, rather than the movie being a financial flock. Oh wait, it is. :|It's a simple matter of movie wanting more positive reaction to it's promotion and this one didn't get it enough.
You know that "a picture says a 1000 words" deal? Well, ***** that cuz noone is gonna understand a whole movie universe from one poster.When you are "promoting" something then people shouldn't have to use google to find it out. That's not a good promotional image.
And I proved that they can be the same. So we are back to square one.Advertise the movie.
The reason I pasted dictionary definitions is to make the context in which I use those words clear. The person who I responded to said the words mean the same thing and I proved they don't as there are different definitions depending on the context in which they are being used.
We're talking about wether the poster promotes violence against women (a negative behaviour rather than a product), to which I say a clear "no". Atleast that's what I'm talking about.
I thought this thread is about femminist circles boycotting Fox for supposedly promoting violence against women, rather than the movie being a financial flock. Oh wait, it is. :|
Boycotting as in protesting (in internet tems), like making a big deal out of nothing.No feminist called for boycotting the movie here so I don't know what you are talking about. Exactly how big is this circle who is boycotting it for that reason and not because of it's comparatively weak script?
So one woman objects and few other agree and you start claiming a mob of feminists at first and then the term 'boycott' when there was no such call either and the feminists are the one exaggerating and over reacting here? How does that work out? @_@Boycotting as in protesting (in internet tems), like making a big deal out of nothing.
@bold: And what are you even talking about now? What does the quality of a script have anything to do with this thread? Also, why are you selectively responding to my points?
First of all, I didn't claim ALL femminists are protesting against the poster, I made all mentiones vague without specifying how many are involved as I actually have no idea how many are there and neither does anyone else. Protests came from a group of femminists, I am now arguing against what that group of femminists is saying. Not putting anything into anyone's mouth. Better?So one woman objects and few other agree and you start claiming a mob of feminists out to get men and use the term boycott when there was nos cuh calls either and the faminists are the one exaggerating?
How does that work out?
I try my best to tackle every point my opponets raise. If I failed to respond to some it was most likely because they slipped past me. Tell me what I missed and I'll be sure to reply.You replied to my points selectively too.
I have no idea what topic you're invested in or not. You quoted me and now I'm responding. Also, I give 7 days of time for my opponets to respond, so you don't need to feel pressured in answering as soon as possible in a sloppy manner in place of making a quality reply when you find the time. This is a forum rather than a live chat, I'm ready to wait.Besides don't expect me to elaborate on a topic I am not really invested in beyond the surface + at 2 AM when I need to wake up at 6 AM at the latest. that reminds me - why the hell I am even awake yet.. later.. I would rather catch on my sleep than continuing this debate.
The funny thing is it was a key scene in the ANBU filler promos. xdimagine naruto manga cover which shows kakashi stabbing rin in the chest with his chidori.
will you people be offended by that? this is literally the same thing
Still not a reason for them to ***** about. The process of choosing the billboard was probably completely arbitrary and no one in their right minds would take this matter seriously.Yep. You may think people like you are the only audience but if they want to hold on to milking this franchise, they want that 12 year old too who may be watching it for the first time or the 8 year olds who have only watched the posters so far and may not see one of these movies for another couple or more years. Plus they are trying to catch the global market.
And let me assure you very few people know any of the previous movie here. The theater was still so empty that movie was to start at 1:10 PM and I was able to get the best seats easily at 1:05. We have intermissions here and usually we get ads during that time- we had few generic ones but then we ended up watching the plain screen for some time. And they didn't even bother to run the end credits for this one. It was later only that I learned it had a few important scenes that may be used later. In contrast Kung fu Panda and avengers etc were hard to get. And they covered it completely and even after the end credits they kept showing promos of other movies.
So yeah.. Fox apologized because they want more audience to hang on. It's business.