If your referencing that we cant post votes I didnt see him saying he wouldnt post vote count with names not showing.
If your referencing that we cant post votes I didnt see him saying he wouldnt post vote count with names not showing.
So lets look at it logically - if he were scum, such a stance would ensure a 1 for 1 trade if he pushed the lynch through, would it not? mafia cant win doing that, and i highly suspect my take is in the minority hereWell, it's Day 2 now. The context is different enough for that read to be totally invalidated - the fact that Ratchet was not only ultimately wrong but attempted to cast doubt on an OBVIOUSLY town role before shoddily diverting to the next wagon totally negates the objection I had to lynching him from yesterday - which is that he has no scum motive. He reversed that entirely at the very end of the day.
Well, he didn't push the lynch through did he? He forced a claim and got rid of a difficult player. I thought pushing a 1 for 1 is what he was doing yesterday as well, but that didn't pan out.So lets look at it logically - if he were scum, such a stance would ensure a 1 for 1 trade if he pushed the lynch through, would it not? mafia cant win doing that, and i highly suspect my take is in the minority here
Me,Who wants to be lead to the promised land?
Me,
Lets get it.
I millered claimed myself.feel its worth pointing out that Rej was also technically a miller if you read his passives, which brings some doubt on Tpeins claim
I mean thats possible, but then why not keep up the charade today too? Why share the information about the passives, specifically the reflection today, but not yesterday? Why share it at all in fact, why not just attempt to bait more roles and provide prospective teammates with cover?Well, he didn't push the lynch through did he? He forced a claim and got rid of a difficult player. I thought pushing a 1 for 1 is what he was doing yesterday as well, but that didn't pan out.
Furthermore, I feel that as a player Ratchet has the confidence to go for risky plays and think he can pick up the pieces. But ultimately, the essence of what your asking is *would Ratchet intentionally hurt his and his team's chances of victory with this play*?
And so we go back to the point I just made to you, which is that we don't have all of the information available to evaluate whether that play was truly detrimental. Even operating with just what we know, if Ratchet's goal was to attract a lot of negative attention to himself, that is perfectly in line with his reflect one shot. Think about it - not only would any shots coming his way backfire but any investigations would come up innocent because they're not hitting his neutralizing passive, they're hitting the cop who investigated him
So, yeah.
How about this claim.I feel like T-Pein should probably at least character claim, btw.
Bro I've cracked Ratchet's code. I'm in the mainframe. I've got him downloaded.I mean thats possible, but then why not keep up the charade today too? Why share the information about the passives, specifically the reflection today, but not yesterday? Why share it at all in fact, why not just attempt to bait more roles and provide prospective teammates with cover?
Theres probably more animus to lynch him today given SKs flip and he has less visibility of other players intentions due to the restriction - It seems very sub-optimal to me
How about this claim.
I followed you and you attacked Ultra violet