Er, no.
I don't agree that t was dogshit though. That doesn't mean I can't come to the wrong conclusion. I also don't agree that I've played "Ben Shapiro" style, either.
Gram has mechanical information regarding that. I do not.
Poison was a sensible target. Who would you rather I have blocked? I couldn't have known she could make superkills.
Of course you can be wrong. But if you're consistently wrong for nonsensical reasons the most likely conclusion is that you're simply scum.
Counterpoint: as scum, I should objectively be bussed there, because even if I survive the Day 1 lynch, I'll be up for a lynch Day 2 after the Town flip. Do you believe I'd demand my scum team risk themselves to survive one more day? If so, I don't know what to tell you. You clearly don't think I'm a competent scum player.
Or you could nab a free town lynch and then have a planned bus on you tomorrow, which would actually be the optimal play here. Unfortunately for you, SK just happened to claim the one role that you couldn't possible shade.
And how the **** have I been "consistently" wrong? Several people agreed with my read on Soul, that was why he was the leading wagon. My read on Poison was proven correct, and clearly I was right to distrust Rej, so...? 50/50 is "cocnsitently wrong" in your book?
Bullshit. Even if I got a Noctis lynch, the following Day Phase I'd be likely lynched, and then when my wagon is analysed Poison would look really bad. Nothing optimal about that, and you know it. Like I said, your logic here requires me to have told Poison to side with Soul, and then suddenly to demand Poison vote to save me, compromising the both of us for a one-day reprieve. It's literally never how I've approached scum, and even if you take my history aside, it's such a self-centered and suboptimal strategy to employ that it makes no sense if you assume even basic competency from Scum!Ratchet.
Your read on Soul was based on his meta, I don't think anyone shared that with you. Soul was keeping a low profile, because in hindsight he was one of the games most important power roles, so people independently came to the conclusion that he was sus.
You're heavily relying on the assumption that you and your team mates are perfectly in unison they can very well act on their own. Poison was not aware Noctis was the lynch at the time he casted his vote, and there was plenty of other people on SK's wagon that could serve as potential mislynches going into tomorrow. Depending on who your team mates are, no, it is *not* optimal to go -1 day one and expect them to coast off that credibility.
Nope, my read on Soul was based on his play *this game*. The point is, he was awful, and several people agreed with me. His play doesn't suddenly become good because he was actually Town, he played like scum and duly was forced into claiming.
Sure, but it does say I was right. And given that I'm addressing your claim that I've been *consistently wrong*, I think it's very much relevant to bring up. Or are you going to try and tell me providing examples of being right doesn't attack the notion that I've been wrong far too often to be Town?
Then you don't know me as well as you think you do. You brought up he was likely to be a certain character, I agreed with you (thinking it was Ravus), and decided to drop it after it gained no traction, because it was a waste of time. Now, information has come to light that requires it to be reviewed, which is why I'm asking for it again. You can spin whatever conclusion you like, but don't pretend there is only one way to read this here.
No, not "perfectly" in unison. Just in some form of unison. I would like to think, after a whole Day Phase as the leading wagon, I would have took a moment or two to ensure my team mates look good in light of a likely flip of mine. I probably wouldn't demand they bus me, but I certainly would tell them to keep it open given that, even if I survived that day, the pressure on me probably wouldn't go away. Actually, I would have probably just bussed Poison and tried to ride the credit myself, because I've played Mafia for a little while, and understand that being scum requires longer-term planning. The idea that I'd have my scum team so careless as to compromise at least one of my partners needlessly for the gain of a single day phase for myself assumes I'm not just extremely selfish as a team mate, but also so self-absorbed that I would rather sacrifice the whole game just to avoid the ignomy of being lynched Day 1. Horseshit.
No he has a specific passive denoting that he will investigate guilty. Its ambiguous on the part of the host as to what that guilty is (one would assume Niflheim aligned, as scanning as Ardyn aligned would be self explanatory), but lets say that passive didn't exist, he would scan as Ardyn Aligned. Why then go to the trouble of including this as a passive at all if the intent wasn't to be able to claim it?
I mean the specific allegation about partner equity, you're using wifom logic to explain why a team mate should bus you here but you don't actually refute the accusation that Poison is your partner and provide an explanation for his inconsistent actions.
Again, the host needs to specify by default what a 3p will scan as, especially for a "survivor" role. You're looking too far into it.
