Feminists want UN to censor Internet

[EnderWolf1013]

>Taking Anita and/or zoe seriously

>ever

I wouldn't be surprised if the UN invited them just to get some laughs.

 

[Punk Hazard]

OT: What a joke.

bitch needs a punch in the face to wake up.

Yeah that's a completely appropriate response to a verbal request in a meeting that didn't threaten the safety of anyone. Violence.

 

[slimreaper]

OT: What a joke.



Yeah that's a completely appropriate response to a verbal request in a meeting that didn't threaten the safety of anyone. Violence.

What you need to understand is the only real threat is the threat of negative actions being taken against the perpetrator


I would love to meet you in real life because i'd ***** you and you obviously wouldn't do anything about it.

Get off your fcking high horse. You don't get to decide what's an appropriate action for others

 

[Ripple Hole]

What you need to understand is the only real threat is the threat of negative actions being taken against the perpetrator


I would love to meet you in real life because i'd ***** you and you obviously wouldn't do anything about it.

Get off your fcking high horse. You don't get to decide what's an appropriate action for others

LOL wtf r u talking about slimreaper?
She has some shit suggestions and you think its appropriate to
beat her over it? Stop being blind, if you think people deserve to be
beat over dumb ideas plenty of mofos should/would be allowed to beat
you over the crap you spew so often.

That aside attacking someone for saying words that obviously won't go far
and attacking someone(you) in self defense are both completely different.

 

[Punk Hazard]

What you need to understand is the only real threat is the threat of negative actions being taken against the perpetrator


I would love to meet you in real life because i'd ***** you and you obviously wouldn't do anything about it.

Get off your fcking high horse. You don't get to decide what's an appropriate action for others

What threats? Censorship? Censorship is a big issue, but not one that warrants violence against the ones doing the censorship.

Sure you would. There's your desperate desire to look edgy again.

I didn't decide this, laws, common sense and common decency does. There is no court, judge, or law that will agree with you for attacking someone because they asked for censorship. If you're too stupid to see why punching someone because they said violent commentary should be censored, then there's sadly nothing that can be done for you.

 

[slimreaper]

What threats? Censorship? Censorship is a big issue, but not one that warrants violence against the ones doing the censorship.

Sure you would. There's your desperate desire to look edgy again.

I didn't decide this, laws, common sense and common decency does. There is no court, judge, or law that will agree with you for attacking someone because they asked for censorship. If you're too stupid to see why punching someone because they said violent commentary should be censored, then there's sadly nothing that can be done for you.

I didn't say I would attack anyone. I came at you because you seem to think you're the one who gets to decide these things. Why do you always have to weigh in whenever someone makes a statement about violence and how it isn't the proper reaction. In some scenarios(not this one, but not necessarily life threatening) violence is warranted.

You must be registered for see images

You continually thinnk I need to be edgy but in actuality that just you trying to seem superior again. What a surprise.

 

[Ripple Hole]

I didn't say I would attack anyone. I came at you because you seem to think you're the one who gets to decide these things. Why do you always have to weigh in whenever someone makes a statement about violence and how it isn't the proper reaction. In some scenarios(not this one, but not necessarily life threatening) violence is warranted.

You must be registered for see images

You continually thinnk I need to be edgy but in actuality that just you trying to seem superior again. What a surprise.

Is this a legendary straw woman?

 

[Punk Hazard]

I didn't say I would attack anyone. I came at you because you seem to think you're the one who gets to decide these things. Why do you always have to weigh in whenever someone makes a statement about violence and how it isn't the proper reaction. In some scenarios(not this one, but not necessarily life threatening) violence is warranted.

You must be registered for see images

You continually thinnk I need to be edgy but in actuality that just you trying to seem superior again. What a surprise.

And I didn't say that to you either, I was talking to Arkham Knight and you jumped in. This isn't me deciding what's appropriate, this is common sense, morality and the law deciding what is. The fact of the matter is, punching a woman because she said violent comments should be censored is against the law, morally wrong because those comments don't warrant that response, and an overreaction via common sense because it is more than what is necessary.

You are definitely trying really hard to be edgy with your typical keyboard warrior comments.

 

[slimreaper]

And I didn't say that to you either, I was talking to Arkham Knight and you jumped in. This isn't me deciding what's appropriate, this is common sense, morality and the law deciding what is. The fact of the matter is, punching a woman because she said violent comments should be censored is against the law, morally wrong because those comments don't warrant that response, and an overreaction via common sense because it is more than what is necessary.

You are definitely trying really hard to be edgy with your typical keyboard warrior comments.

The problem is you feel like its you who needs to tell people that this isn't the right reaction. Go be a ****ing judge.


heres edgy. you're a ****ing uppity ***** who has never been faced with any real adversity so you compensate by trying to be super sensitive to those who have, because you feel guilty. That's why there isn't one cause of the left that you can admit is total bullshit. even I can do that with the right

 

[Punk Hazard]

The problem is you feel like its you who needs to tell people that this isn't the right reaction. Go be a ****ing judge.


heres edgy. you're a ****ing uppity ***** who has never been faced with any real adversity so you compensate by trying to be super sensitive to those who have, because you feel guilty. That's why there isn't one cause of the left that you can admit is total bullshit. even I can do that with the right

You mean like the way you feel the way to say it is right? You're doing the same thing I am, but only seeing the fault in me saying it because it's adverse to what you believe in. Who are you to say it's right for people to smoke in cars with their children, that colleges' current methods are wrong, and gun control is wrong? The biggest hypocrite here is you.

Funny how your purposeful attempt at being edgy and your other posts only have swearing as the difference between the two.

 

[slimreaper]

You mean like the way you feel the way to say it is right? You're doing the same thing I am, but only seeing the fault in me saying it because it's adverse to what you believe in. Who are you to say it's right for people to smoke in cars with their children, that colleges' current methods are wrong, and gun control is wrong? The biggest hypocrite here is you.

Funny how your purposeful attempt at being edgy and your other posts only have swearing as the difference between the two.

I didn't say its right. I already said it's not the proper response in that scenario. I'm responding to your sickening self-righteousness.

personal freedom. You should look it up

 

[Ripple Hole]

I didn't say its right. I already said it's not the proper response in that scenario. I'm responding to your sickening self-righteousness.

personal freedom. You should look it up

u feel it's okay to punch someone at times for an opinion they hold
and claim personal freedom when tables turn?

 

[Punk Hazard]

I didn't say its right. I already said it's not the proper response in that scenario. I'm responding to your sickening self-righteousness.

personal freedom. You should look it up

Except this isn't me deciding what is the appropriate reaction, it's the morals established by the majority of society, common sense established by the majority of society and the laws established that all say it is not the appropriate reaction. I am not the author, I am the messenger.

You are perfectly free to express how edgy you want to be perceived as, I can't and won't try to stop you.

 

[slimreaper]

u feel it's okay to punch someone at times for an opinion they hold
and claim personal freedom when tables turn?

I literally said directly the opposite of that in my post you quoted.

 

[Ripple Hole]

I literally said directly the opposite of that in my post you quoted.

I literally wouldn't know

 

[slimreaper]

Except this isn't me deciding what is the appropriate reaction, it's the morals established by the majority of society, common sense established by the majority of society and the laws established that all say it is not the appropriate reaction. I am not the author, I am the messenger.

You are perfectly free to express how edgy you want to be perceived as, I can't and won't try to stop you.

No the **** you aren't. That's the point

 

[Punk Hazard]

No the **** you aren't. That's the point

I am simply telling you what has been determined by majority in terms of morals and common sense, and what the law says. Go ahead, punch a woman because they said an opinion, and see how many people nearby cheer you on and if you aren't arrested.

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

I am simply telling you what has been determined by majority in terms of morals and common sense, and what the law says. Go ahead, punch a woman because they said an opinion, and see how many people nearby cheer you on and if you aren't arrested.

WTF, did he just say who are you to decide violence is wrong in that situation when the law agrees with you too?

Lmao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Punk Hazard]

WTF, did he just say who are you to decide violence is wrong in that situation when the law agrees with you too?

Lmao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yup, he did, because who's to say punching someone in the face because they said an opinion is wrong?

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

Yup, he did, because who's to say punching someone in the face because they said an opinion is wrong?

I guess I give this guy too much credit sometimes.