[Discussion] Fairy Tail is poorly written.
- Thread starter Solidus Solidus Solidus
- Start date
- Status
DoubleKamui
Active member
Well, I can't really say that much about this, since I just started watching(Haven't read the manga yet), and I'm only on like episode 87. It's not that bad at all for me, but the only thing that can get annoying is the 'power of hope' thing that they keep doing, and Natsu becoming stronger through his friends or whatever kind of message they are trying to say.
Regardless, this manga is keeping me occupied and interested, and the main character is a lot more likeable than that moron Naruto, so that's a plus. The characters also seem to be well created, and this verse has a variety of different things to show. It almost reminds me of One Piece and it's verse.
This manga seems to be bashed a lot, and in a way, if you are only trying to watch or read a story for hardcore action, then I guess this type of manga is not for you, but I also like humor and creativity, and that's one of the reasons why this Fairy Tail thing is looking like a win for me.
P.S. Jellal FTW baby
Regardless, this manga is keeping me occupied and interested, and the main character is a lot more likeable than that moron Naruto, so that's a plus. The characters also seem to be well created, and this verse has a variety of different things to show. It almost reminds me of One Piece and it's verse.
This manga seems to be bashed a lot, and in a way, if you are only trying to watch or read a story for hardcore action, then I guess this type of manga is not for you, but I also like humor and creativity, and that's one of the reasons why this Fairy Tail thing is looking like a win for me.
P.S. Jellal FTW baby
Forbidden Tale
Active member
Something like meh, instead of people just trying to find similarity between two mangas (but in more than half of their post, similarity even don't exist) they should look deeper in character, his personality, than they will understand things.
Now, I'm going to use your logic, because I do, now I agree that FT is rip off, using that same logic, I realized that OP is also a rip off:
Now, I'm going to use your logic, because I do, now I agree that FT is rip off, using that same logic, I realized that OP is also a rip off:
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
Last edited:
This thread somehow went from being FT is poorly written to Ft is a ripoff of OP... i could argue that 90% shonen manga are rip-off of DB series, seriously, you don't like it, we get it, it isn't the best, we get it, but what you're doing right now is spouting BS, the only legitimate similarity/ripoff between FT and OP is Shanks and Gildarts, all other claim are BS, y'all are just trying to hard
OP: It isn't that good but it's alright, it's not serious and mainly just an easy going manga, sure if you started off with the anime you might not like it
OP: It isn't that good but it's alright, it's not serious and mainly just an easy going manga, sure if you started off with the anime you might not like it
You can call fail fail fail all you want, But you're not looking at it correctly.
For one you're comparing individual images. But Luffy and Natsu kicking down the door is one scene. So it's wounded comrade on the ground, main char pissed off, party going on inside, kick down the door, silhouettes in smoke. If you look at them one by one you could say they don't look a like that much but if there is an entire segment it's pretty much copy paste. However this is not Hiro;s fault, the anime company did that (no idea who does FT Studio Pierrot or Toei maybe ?)
Same goes for the water scene with Mavis, It's too much of a coincidence that even all the angles used to show an emerging sphere from the water with someone standing on the surface to be called original.
As for the 'separate' characters, they belong in one group, How much of a coincedence is it that you have pointy hair with sunglasses guy, snake person, leopard skin, bible giant etc all in one group.
Don't compare them one on one, look at the big picture. Of course Hiro isn't making identical copies, but he is at least heavily inspired.
Memento Mori
Active member
Awards
Those scans are a fail,so I called it.Then how should I look at it ? Look it at the way how the people who are calling it a rip off ?
So far not just only Luffy & Natsu kicked down the door in manga history or only them ?.Ofcourse they are parties or everything else but still one cannot simply claim that is a rip off based on just that.I have yet to see a copy paste.Eventhough there are some similarities there are some minor or major variations in the depiction.For One Piece it is TOEI and For FT it is A1 Animations.Is that also known as studio Pierrot ?.
Who called that is an original ?.It is not like One Piece or Fairy Tail are the only animes with those water scenes.But people tend to make a nonsense about it.
So what is that if it isn't neither a co-incidence nor inspiration ?.So Hiro ripped off that ?.First of all if he did that then is there a proof to it that from what Hiro ripped off isn't a rip off of other one ?.No we don't.I will stick to it more like an inspiration or their love towards other series just like what Oda said about the accusations he faced off for being copying Tim burton or kawanabe.Oda said that it is his love for other series and he inspired a lot from other verses,cultures and also using references from histories/legends.so apparently why don't that be the case for hiro too ?.Also Hiro does use most of his references from the real life stories and from some of the games.We can call all of them a rip off or copy paste if one use the same logic and there will not be anything original(on large scale).
They are intended to be posted one on one with little to no clue whoever made those scans.Even if we look at the big picture the storyboard is completely different to begin with.Having similar characters isn't a rip off.By that logic as I have said already we can pretty much create pics like that.For that all we need is finding those similar pics and joining them.Those similar characters are in one group and their storyboards are different.And also those characters names,designs and some of their powers came from the references Oda used from some mythology,Novel,Verses etc..,That aren't any original to begin with.Anything further is pointless from here on.
@Bold,that is what I want to say too just like how majority of the mangaka's till now.
Gotta go now.
The Dreamer
Active member
Meh... It's nothing special. Just a happy-go-lucky protagonist going around with his gang beating bad guys and doing quests. It's not something from what you expect mind-blowing plot twists or plain logic.
I watch it because my friend likes it so I checked it out and sticked around just to kill some time with it. It's enjoyable when you're not nitpicky.
I watch it because my friend likes it so I checked it out and sticked around just to kill some time with it. It's enjoyable when you're not nitpicky.
iiPyromaniac
Member
None of these are rip-offs. Try harder. A Rip-off is a carbon copy, not something that shares similarities. If one person comes up with an idea, then another takes the same idea and improves upon it or alters it to suit their own needs doesn't mean the new idea that has stemmed from a previous idea is a rip-off.
[END REPLY]
As I have stated previously, everything stems from something else. All Mangaka have looked to other Mangaka's for inspiration. Using another's idea as inspiration for your own idea is a commonly recurring theme in their line of work. It's hard to come up with something that is truly unique. If you think you've thought of something that is unique, think again. I can guarantee you that there will always be someone else out there who has likely thought of the same thing or something very close to it.
Natsu, Goku, Gohan, Luffy, Naruto - All these characters eat a lot, are powerful, have loved ones they would go to great lengths to protect, and so on. Does this mean they are all carbon copies of each other? No. What it means is that it's a commonly recurring theme that is used often. It's much like having a female character be violent towards the male lead for either no reason or because she's a Tsundere. Both of these are frequently used in Anime, but the characters themselves still have something that separates them from having the same personality.
The idea of having a king under the sea? Look at Disney's King Triton. Does that make King Neptune from One Piece a carbon copy of him? No. Stop trying to make out FT rips off other manga. If you're going to call one thing a rip-off then say something else isn't a rip-off even though it shares the same themes, you're being hypocritical and biased and you shouldn't even be posting until you learn how to use that thing inside your head that we like to call a "Brain".
If it's not a carbon copy, then it's not a rip-off. A lot of characters share a lot of personality traits, but they're not all copies of each other because they all have something different from each other. Natsu is impulsive, Naruto has shown that he can be rash and impulsive in a fight but can also calmly assess a situation, Goku just loves to fight, Luffy's goal is to become King of the Pirates but he has faith in his friends abilities. He knows that they can handle themselves. They're all different from each other. Thus meaning they aren't rip-offs. If Dragons were rip-offs of Tailed Beasts, then Tailed Beasts would be a rip-off of Demons from InuYasha or something else from some other anime.
If you're going to use flawed logic, do a better job at hiding it. If I had to guess, I'd say you don't watch much anime aside from the mainstream anime and think that your favourite tops all because it's the original work and wasn't copied from anything else. Newsflash, inspiration for Naruto came from another character [Insert shocked expression here] from, you guessed it, another manga. Inspiration is not the same thing as copying.
Last edited:
well the art style is pretty same in both mangas, but it doesnt necessarily means its a rip off, inspiration is a better word, and oda is a senior mangaka and more successful, taking inspiratin from him is no big crime
Saikyokami
Active member
Awards
Your mother is poorly written, *****.
jokes aside. Kinda. Still entertaining nonetheless.
Professor Finesser
Active member
All I will say is this:
1. The critics love it.
2. The manga is still making new chapters after over 400 chapters, meaning its selling well.
3. It has an anime, video games, toys, and movies being made based off of it.
If this is considered bad writing, then I want to do bad writing.
1. The critics love it.
2. The manga is still making new chapters after over 400 chapters, meaning its selling well.
3. It has an anime, video games, toys, and movies being made based off of it.
If this is considered bad writing, then I want to do bad writing.
My poor Mira should of got a new form during tartarus but ended up getting stomped and being Erza's cheerleader. :T_T:
For the ripoff part, I'd say Hiro gets inspired by other mangas...a little too much XD
The plot I completely agree
I dont get hyped for their fights anymore cause the outcome is so freaking clear
No hype for Zeref or Acno or new continent cause you know villains in this show :bdpf:
Still FT is one of my Top/Hated mangas/anime
|
Please avoid bumping dead threads as its against the rules
~Thread closed |
Last edited by a moderator:
- Status