The validity of his statements depends entirely upon your experience with evangelical christians and some of your own fundamental views of things.
The "problem" with with his logic is that the actual Gospels comprise only about 10% of the Bible.
Also, keep in mind that any time someone asks you: "What Would Jesus Do" - keep in mind that flipping over tables and chasing people with whips is within the realm of documented possibilities.
Anyway - Jesus did not come to overturn God's laws. He came to overturn our use of those laws. This "New Covenant" is more or less "Don't use God's teachings as an excuse to drag the person you don't like out into public and stone him to death." Since, basically, that is what the Jews were doing at the time.
Just as the police use things like Civil Asset Forfeiture in today's world, the Pharisee and the devious within Jewish society were using the laws as a means of extortion and control.
No. It's not suddenly okay to cheat on your wife, nor is it suddenly a good idea to eat undercooked meats (the reason for Kosher was because some meats need to be cooked thoroughly or are prone to spoiling far more quickly).
Keep in mind we were also talking a time in Israel when Rome was very unpopular and the "messiah" was commonly perceived as being a sort of King David who would rally an army against Rome and bring about the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth. They were expecting a warlord who would bring, basically, conquest.
Part of why Jesus so frequently spoke of peace was because the Romans were quick to Rofl-Stomp Jews who proclaimed to be the Messiah (since that was translated as proclaiming one's self to be a King and in violation of Roman laws regarding treason). Jesus grew up and saw the nearby town burned to the ground over a would-be Messiah.
Anyway - the point is that not everyone agrees upon the context of Jesus' message or the extent to which it applies. For example - if I walk out onto the beach and see a young woman being gang-raped, I imagine that Jesus would approve the use of force to protect her. There are times where violence is necessary if good is to survive.
Now - as for the logic of Evangelicals...
What, exactly, says they are being hateful?
If you believe that someone is going to hell for what they are doing - reminding them of the consequences you foresee for them is not hateful. Just because someone is made to feel uncomfortable does not mean that the emotion directed at them is hatred. Someone who cheats on his wife should damned sure feel uncomfortable beneath my evaluation of their decision.
"Love" is not always expressed as hugs and rainbows.
Now - there are those out there who I would agree are being hateful about their delivery of things. Saying: "God Hates You" is well seated in hatred, I would agree.
But that isn't how all Evangelicals word their concerns, nor how most of them truly feel.
I would argue that most of them are deeply concerned that society is embracing twisted and destructive moral/ethical patterns. The recent reports from "Spring Break" highlight, precisely, the consequences they have been warning of and concerned about for decades. When people are openly gang-raped and crowds simply watch and record with phones - the notion that we are a "good" society that is dedicated to protecting the rights of the individual goes right out the window. Even if none of those people were in support of the action - their failure to stop it represents an allowance for evil.
In that regard - I would kindly remind humanists of their own hypocrisy.
Christianity is what led to the success of the West. Say what you will about its follies and errors - it was the Christian value of the individual and the unnecessary nature of violence that allowed the West to succeed and overshadow Rome despite a divided set of cultures that were not unified under one empire. Christian thought allowed for the Enlightenment to take place and paved the way for the Industrial Revolution.
Humanist principles have led to Stalin and Mao. The Russian missionaries who helped restore the shattered culture of the Balkans after centuries of Ottoman rule were thrown into the gulag and exterminated as threats to the natural virtue of man.
So, I would caution humanists to be wary of their own hypocrisy, as they've never once successfully built more than bloody revolutions leading to tyranny.
His logic is way to silly and childish which is why I assume that this is just comedy show. For example if you don't follow the law you're considered a criminal.
No person shall do any of the following while in any facility or on any vehicle of a public transportation system: […]
(3) Expectorate upon a person, facility, or vehicle.
You must be registered for see links
If you don't follow such a silly rule like the one above, people have the right to call you a criminal.(of course if you're found guilty in case you actually go to the court for that XD). So yeah the point is nothing is perfect, rules are meant to be broken....
But yeah everyone is hypocrite in their own way....
It's unfortunate you didn't address any of the points.
Why is it okay for this form of Christian to quote 'love thy neighbor', and turn around and try to keep gay people out of modern society?
Why can Jesus be peaceful and MLK practice demonstration without violence, but these modern Evangelical Christians are super gung ho to kill them some "terrorists". You yourself have expressed this sentiment that Muslims are somehow inferior to the lining of your boot and the butt of your rifle. However they stand a chance to take over the US because Obama may or may not be a Muslim and he may or may not be trying to kill all of us 'Mericans.'
Why are people not murdering their neighbors who work on Sundays?
You can't claim to be saved by Jesus and in the same breath claim you would kill all them Muslim terrorists, or gays in a heartbeat(Not saying you said that). If you're going to base your life off of a book, be consistent with your bullshit(I'm not calling the bible bullshit).
Why not both? Lol.Does Aim64C type 400 WPM or does he spend six hours on each post?
What I would like to know is why he bashes Muslims for their actions but tries to justify Christians.
Because you're an idiot.
You must be registered for see links
"A man has reportedly been blindfolded and thrown off a tower block in Syria for ‘being gay’ before being stoned to death after surviving the fall.
New images have emerged appearing to show ISIS militants hurling the man off the seven-storey building in the town of Tal Abyad in Raqqa.
The man, who was supposedly being punished for having a ‘homosexual affair’, apparently survived the fall, but was stoned to death by a waiting crowd at the foot of the tower block."
By all means.
Show me where Christians are doing this.
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
"Three Iranian men have been executed after being found guilty of charges related to homosexuality, according to a semi-official news agency.
The men, only identified by their initials, were hanged on Sunday in the south-western city of Ahvaz, the capital of Iran's Khuzestan province."
[video=youtube;AjCh873ls4Y]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjCh873ls4Y[/video]
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
If you think that the beliefs of even the most radical of Christians come -close- to the beliefs of moderate Muslims - you're an idiot.
I never said Christianity was as extreme as Islam. I said you are quick to bash Islam for its beliefs but try to justify some Christian beliefs, like the Earth being 6000 years old.
Does Aim64C type 400 WPM or does he spend six hours on each post?
I always thought he just copy and pasted a lot of information from websites. I am too ADHD to read 1/3 of his posts. I always try to keep my replies brief, but succinct. His posts always remind me of this Einstein quote:
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."
Because you're an idiot.
You must be registered for see links
"A man has reportedly been blindfolded and thrown off a tower block in Syria for ‘being gay’ before being stoned to death after surviving the fall.
New images have emerged appearing to show ISIS militants hurling the man off the seven-storey building in the town of Tal Abyad in Raqqa.
The man, who was supposedly being punished for having a ‘homosexual affair’, apparently survived the fall, but was stoned to death by a waiting crowd at the foot of the tower block."
By all means.
Show me where Christians are doing this.
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
"Three Iranian men have been executed after being found guilty of charges related to homosexuality, according to a semi-official news agency.
The men, only identified by their initials, were hanged on Sunday in the south-western city of Ahvaz, the capital of Iran's Khuzestan province."
[video=youtube;AjCh873ls4Y]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjCh873ls4Y[/video]
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
If you think that the beliefs of even the most radical of Christians come -close- to the beliefs of moderate Muslims - you're an idiot.