EMS Sasuke vs BM Naruto

[KidGamer65]

Wait before I go on, what scans are you talking about? Literally, the only thing you had going for you as a direct comparison between the Bijuu was the hand size being so much smaller compared to previously.

Uh, no. Kurama's whole body was shown getting smaller, not just it's hand. Stop saying "just the hand size".

Since it's confirmed to be the same a this point, it means his bone size did in fact grow back

Wrong, because multiple scans show the following:

1. That his body size is smaller than Full Kurama's.

2. That he is not 4x or even 2x smaller than any Bijuu, after Minato takes his chakra.

So I'll repeat, what scan do you speak of that puts 100% Kurama above 50% Kurama in size? Hopefully not another anomaly scan which you claim makes him larger, I have tonnes of those for other Bijuu, they don't hold much weight in an actual size comparison due to inconsistent art. And do note, 100% Kurama=Gamabunta size, who is just as large as Ichibi, who is just as large as Yin Kurama, who looks just as large as 100% Kurama in Konoha.

Same exact scan. Go look at Kurama in the chains before and after he loses his chakra. His body size got smaller. Not like I should have to point it out anyway, if his hand size got that much smaller then it's common sense that his body got smaller.

And no, 100% Kurama is not equal to Gamabunta in size. Gamabunta is only as large as it's head and upper body. If Gamabunta was as large as Kurama, then when it sat on him it would have completely covered his whole body, not just his upper body.

 

[KCN]

Naruto with his ultimate and flash TBB's would wreck Sasuke. Who by the way has pathetic Susano'o feats. A sizeable enough TBB would bust it open no problem.

There's nothing there for Sasuke. How does he even hurt Naruto? Who by this point is miles faster and has an extremely tough cloak which tanked a Juubi's laser. All Sasuke can do is camp inside Susano'o but that would be short lived.

 

[Apêx1]

Uh, no. Kurama's whole body was shown getting smaller, not just it's hand. Stop saying "just the hand size".

How does it matter? His hand still regrew everything it lost, and that means loads of bone. Yet you suggest in all your posts that Kurama cannot regrow bone, he can merely regain flesh. It's rather contradictory. If he regrew the bone on his hand, then he could regrow the bone on his body. Nothing to debate about this, it's fact.

Wrong, because multiple scans show the following:

1. That his body size is smaller than Full Kurama's.

2. That he is not 4x or even 2x smaller than any Bijuu, after Minato takes his chakra.

1. Not necessarily.

2. Thus his paws shrunk un-proportionally to the rest of his body

Same exact scan. Go look at Kurama in the chains before and after he loses his chakra. His body size got smaller. Not like I should have to point it out anyway, if his hand size got that much smaller then it's common sense that his body got smaller.

Yes, but the entire point I am making is that his hand size got smaller, meaning his bone got smaller. His bone thus regrew in size, meaning bone can regrow, meaning his own bodies bones would've regrown to natural size as did his hand. Don't see what you are trying to debate here. Unless you are insinuating his hands bones got larger but his body didn't, which makes no sense.

And no, 100% Kurama is not equal to Gamabunta in size. Gamabunta is only as large as it's head and upper body. If Gamabunta was as large as Kurama, then when it sat on him it would have completely covered his whole body, not just his upper body.[/QUOTE]

Seems I miscommunicated. What I am trying to say is that Bunta and this Kurama are comparable to Bunta and 50% Kurama.

 

[KidGamer65]

How does it matter? His hand still regrew everything it lost, and that means loads of bone. Yet you suggest in all your posts that Kurama cannot regrow bone, he can merely regain flesh. It's rather contradictory. If he regrew the bone on his hand, then he could regrow the bone on his body. Nothing to debate about this, it's fact.

Not really. If it's hand grew back to normal size, then it wouldn't be proportional with it's body, which is the issue with the scan, it's contradictory. It shows the same hand size, but smaller body size, yet the hand obviously isn't shown to be the same size as it was before he lost his chakra.

1. Not necessarily.

It does, very clearly in fact.

2. Thus his paws shrunk un-proportionally to the rest of his body

1. No, they didn't. If they did then it wouldn't look natural after he shrunk.

2. He still got smaller, by at least 2x, and at the very least it was noticeable. Unless you think that the following show scans of a creature noticeably smaller than the likes of Hachibi, then there is nothing to debate here.

You must be registered for see links

You must be registered for see links

You must be registered for see links

Kurama was obviously larger than the standard Bijuu before hand, because he isn't smaller than a Bijuu by any significant amount in these scans, right after losing his chakra.

Yes, but the entire point I am making is that his hand size got smaller, meaning his bone got smaller. His bone thus regrew in size, meaning bone can regrow, meaning his own bodies bones would've regrown to natural size as did his hand. Don't see what you are trying to debate here. Unless you are insinuating his hands bones got larger but his body didn't, which makes no sense.

Except it didn't, that's the thing. Kurama did not get larger. It did NOT regain any of it's lost chakra, thus there is no reason for it to return back to it's original size anyway.

@bold underlined: Nothing got bigger. He did not go back to being his regular size.

Seems I miscommunicated. What I am trying to say is that Bunta and this Kurama are comparable to Bunta and 50% Kurama.

Except they aren't, because Bunta is as large as a Bijuu, and Half Kurama, and Full Kurama was shown to be larger than Bunta, and is shown to be larger than a normal Bijuu.

 

[Apêx1]

Not really. If it's hand grew back to normal size, then it wouldn't be proportional with it's body, which is the issue with the scan, it's contradictory. It shows the same hand size, but smaller body size, yet the hand obviously isn't shown to be the same size as it was before he lost his chakra.





It does, very clearly in fact.



1. No, they didn't. If they did then it wouldn't look natural after he shrunk.

2. He still got smaller, by at least 2x, and at the very least it was noticeable. Unless you think that the following show scans of a creature noticeably smaller than the likes of Hachibi, then there is nothing to debate here.

You must be registered for see links

You must be registered for see links

You must be registered for see links

Kurama was obviously larger than the standard Bijuu before hand, because he isn't smaller than a Bijuu by any significant amount in these scans, right after losing his chakra.


Except it didn't, that's the thing. Kurama did not get larger. It did NOT regain any of it's lost chakra, thus there is no reason for it to return back to it's original size anyway.

@bold underlined: Nothing got bigger. He did not go back to being his regular size.



Except they aren't, because Bunta is as large as a Bijuu, and Half Kurama, and Full Kurama was shown to be larger than Bunta, and is shown to be larger than a normal Bijuu.

Hmm.. Given the contradictions, I'll just leave it as an agree to disagree. It's impossible to come to an actual manga conclusion, because manga supports both arguments. Kishi..

 

[KidGamer65]

Hmm.. Given the contradictions, I'll just leave it as an agree to disagree. It's impossible to come to an actual manga conclusion, because manga supports both arguments. Kishi..

Lmao, right, that Kishi.