Because it makes your fate stronger when you attack others on there belief. So why not?
Why even attack other on their belief when they are not attacking you?
But some top scientists believed in God... not that it means anything, just correcting your claim.
Because being attacking is better than being defensive and thinking the world looks pretty. When its not, its ugly. No one achieves anything without conflict. That is how heros are made, that is how villians are made. Sitting there all happy laughy is not how you grow as a person. You need to have real motivation to succeed. You never get it when something is given to you. You need to fight for it. That is how you will succeed. That is why its best to test your knowledge against others like we are doing here. It will help motivate you more to follow your faith. When you see how others without it are suffering.
What are you views than? I bet its to sit there following your belief like a robot.Everything you said contradicts to the core of religious morals.
Certainly not blowing up people or burning them just to make them fear god.
@bold: Backing out as usual. You know your views are not that deep nor are they any better than mine. Hence why you back out before you get embarassed in public. Its ok I will applaud your insecurity and accept you are not man enough to say such words on a chinese forum.Certainly not blowing up people or burning them just to make them fear god.
But it doesn't even matter what my views are. What you said in your previous post does not conform to any core religious text/moral. How can you "fight" for your religious beliefs if your methods don't even correspond to your religion in the first place?
Eh? What does it even mean your views are better than mine?
Religion has nothing to do with my posts. I am talking about morals here. If you sit there without being challenged you are not living your life.
His idea of religion is different than yours. Why cant you be tolerant and stop forcing your beliefs on him.
Are you really, Lyke? WTF
Lawrence Krauss' definition of "nothing" coincides with quantum vacuum, but quantum vacuum is not nothing - it indeed is something, namely, it consists of fields of energy in fluctuation. We know actually very little about quantum theories (there are something about ten models out there) and none of them really says that particles, let alone universes, can pop into being out of nothing.OT: I don't believe in God, Lawrence Krauss he said that de universe come into existence from nothing, because the total energy of the universe will always 0 so.. is not necessary a divine force.
Anyway try to watch Closer to Truth, you will like this channel!
