[Discussion] Do you support the death penalty?

[BlacLord™]

Why/why not?

 

[Zealotic]

Nah cause it would suck to be falsely accused and then negged for no reason

 

[Osmon]

Yes, idk .

 

[Bronze]

It depends on what crime they done.

If they committed anything from murder to rape, a death penalty is deserved.

Aside religious reasons, criminal's brain functions much more violently than that of normal brain, as medical research proves that. It would be very difficult for society to continue in peacefully, with having to deal with violent animals living.

 

[Flakez]

No.

The convicted will suffer more if he spends his entire life in jail. Death is the easy way out.

 

[Conspirator.]

No I don't support the death penalty. The main reason is that even in the best systems with minimal corruption, there will always be times when the justice system errs. In those times, we'll end up executing innocent men and women. Thus, life imprisonment is a better punishment IMO. Plus, I've never been fond of the whole "eye for an eye" business with regards to executing murders. If someone committed rape, should the punishment be to rape them back?

 

[Handsome Jack]

Sometimes they need to die, and sometimes they don't U_U

 

[BlacLord™]

Nah cause it would suck to be falsely accused and then negged for no reason

I was thinking more along the lines of the whole "eye for an eye" concept.

 

[Venomous Cobra]

Yes, because rotten people who do nothing but to harm humanity without doing anything that's useful for their community should not exist.

And I know that I'm have no authority to Judge another human being, matter fact no one should judge another human's actions but to survive we neer to get rid of.some rules and morals, I mean after all we're weak that's why we kill our own race (humans) therefore sometimes you have to SELFISH

 

[Zealotic]

I was thinking more along the lines of the whole "eye for an eye" concept.

If it were eye for an eye they would have to die the same way the victims did to me. Right now life in prison seems to be the worse of the two

 

[Wabbit]

Yes. Some people don't deserve to live in our society. It might look like a savage of setting examples but some need to be kicked out of system,executed.

 

[Ōkami]

As long as they're tortured first. I like that kinky shit.

 

[Jɑégar]

It depends on what crime they done.

If they committed anything from murder to rape, a death penalty is deserved.

Aside religious reasons, criminal's brain functions much more violently than that of normal brain, as medical research proves that. It would be very difficult for society to continue in peacefully, with having to deal with violent animals living.

I second this.

 

[Jɑégar]

No I don't support the death penalty. The main reason is that even in the best systems with minimal corruption, there will always be times when the justice system errs. In those times, we'll end up executing innocent men and women. Thus, life imprisonment is a better punishment IMO. Plus, I've never been fond of the whole "eye for an eye" business with regards to executing murders. If someone committed rape, should the punishment be to rape them back?

If someone, say, rapped someone/killed someone so dear to you, won't you go after his life? I personally would, regardless of the consequences.

 

[Yusuke Urameshi]

Yes, because rotten people who do nothing but to harm humanity without doing anything that's useful for their community should not exist.

And I know that I have no authority to judge another human being, matter of fact no one should judge another human's actions but to survive we need to get rid of some rules and morals, I mean after all we're weak that's why we kill our own race (humans) therefore sometimes you have to be SELFISH

So I guess Hitler and his regime wasn't so bad, after all? Using your logic, you can't judge him/the Nazis and say that what he/they did was wrong. That's an asinine way of thinking. You can judge people and their actions. It's okay to do so.

And you don't really make much sense.

 

[uzamakininjalegend]

No because a life is a life it shouldnt be determined by people if one should live or not.even if its a murdering psychopath killing the guy wouldn't solve a thing let him rot in jail the death penalty shouldve stopped a long time ago its never ok to take a life unleas yours is in immediate danger even then you shouldn't go for a kill shot

 

[Conspirator.]

If someone, say, rapped someone/killed someone so dear to you, won't you go after his life? I personally would, regardless of the consequences.

That's not a great argument. Just because I might possibly want it, doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. Quite simple. Plus, we would all be so emotional in such a situation, and emotionally fueled thougghts have a tendency to be irrational.

 

[Callypigia]

Ethically and morally It doesn't feel right to determine who lives and who dies through human/judicial intervention. That said I believe that there are plenty of people who have lost their rights to be free citizens. From a business perspective it's cheaper to execute than feed/house/medically treat inmates for life. The incarceration system is complicated and broken beyond the scope of NB.

 

[Jɑégar]

That's not a great argument. Just because I might possibly want it, doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. Quite simple. Plus, we would all be so emotional in such a situation, and emotionally fueled thougghts have a tendency to be irrational.

Not only you though! Everyone won't like this to happen, not even think of it happening, thus death penalties should exist. That way will give second thoughts to whoever urges or is about to to commit such crimes in the future. I agree with what you said about being emotional tho!

 

[NineSNS]

Some criminals are broken beyond repair, and the easy solution is to kill them. It's easy, but not necessarily morally right.