- Joined
- Jun 30, 2012
- Messages
- 27,280
- Reaction score
- 1,690
So what I don't get is, why is DC judged harder than Marvel? Let me just give you a scenario here.
The Superman movie.. Man of steel got bashed on by most/some marvel fans, and some haters and some christopher reeves fanboys/girls. And these were the following reasons:
- Superman was too dark (Too bad its the same superman from the comics.. normal country boy attitude..)
- Superman didn't smile (Even though he did.)
- Superman didn't save people while fighting a godly character who was equal to him or stronger than him. (Yes because superman call pull off a Goku, and make his bent on killing all humans enemy come to an empty spot to clash it out. And he can also be saving people one by one, while fighting a guy who was whipping his ass.. )
- Superman let his dad die (his dad told him to let him die..)
- Superman just wasn't Christopher reeves with his red undies. (And you people believe Reeves was a good superman? roflll. This is always funny coming from those who say superman is too corny or w.e)
^^^^^^^ That is DC being judged on just 1 movie. And now here is what the more vocal internet users are saying, "DC movies better catch up to marvel and produce better movies than Man of steel, cause it sucked.".
Now on that basis lets take a good look at Marvel movies so far (don't assume i'm bashing these movies, i have the dvd for all them, and watch them alot and love them. But i'm giving credit where credit is due):
- Hulk = Trash in front of Man of steel. What was that? Was it even the hulk? Or a big buff green guy who can only throw tanks?
- Captain America : first avenger = Holy shit is this overwanked.. despite the immense corniness from Captain america running to the corniness of the plot and and the costume.. it was at best a 7 or 6 star movie..
- Ironman 1-3 : the only "depthful" superhero movie series Marvel actually has. Why? Because this is the movie that allowed them to compete with Batman. But taking it as a "superhero" comic movie.. still doesn't come at the level of Superman.. Especially the third one.
- Thor 1: Just no.. hardly a superhero comicbook movie.... seemed like a 30 minute short movie when you get done watching it.
- Thor 2: BEST COMIC BOOK Superhero movie made so far, i'm not gonna put this down.. this movie is easily above Man of Steel.
- Winter Soldier: I'll put it a little above Man of Steel, due to it under perfoming Captain America itself.. and the horrible character design.
NOW LETS TALK ABOUT THE BIG BOY THAT IS ALWAYS COMPARED TO MAN OF STEEL... AVENGERS:
1. plothole after plothole
2. Hardly any depth... just being honest
3. sissy ass Alien invasion
4. just had cool moments.. that is it pretty much..
5. The casting.. only 3 people were the correct cast out of the 6 or 7 of them. Fat fury = bad cast, Hawkeye = bad cast, RDJ = bad cast, Just like all those who have been cast as Batman were bad casts for BATMAN himself..until recently when they picked a 6'4" guy to play batman
THIS IS NOT ME BASHING OR PUTTING DOWN THESE MOVIES.. THIS IS ME SIMPLY STATING WHAT I SEE FROM A "negative" point of view.
So there are about uh 2 movies that marvel has.. that are actually better than Man of steel.. when you talk about entertainment/ movie standards and build up alone.. So why does DC even need to trip about Marvel? They don't.... Marvel is marvel, Dc is Dc. So why judge one wayyy more harder than the other one?
The Superman movie.. Man of steel got bashed on by most/some marvel fans, and some haters and some christopher reeves fanboys/girls. And these were the following reasons:
- Superman was too dark (Too bad its the same superman from the comics.. normal country boy attitude..)
- Superman didn't smile (Even though he did.)
- Superman didn't save people while fighting a godly character who was equal to him or stronger than him. (Yes because superman call pull off a Goku, and make his bent on killing all humans enemy come to an empty spot to clash it out. And he can also be saving people one by one, while fighting a guy who was whipping his ass.. )
- Superman let his dad die (his dad told him to let him die..)
- Superman just wasn't Christopher reeves with his red undies. (And you people believe Reeves was a good superman? roflll. This is always funny coming from those who say superman is too corny or w.e)
^^^^^^^ That is DC being judged on just 1 movie. And now here is what the more vocal internet users are saying, "DC movies better catch up to marvel and produce better movies than Man of steel, cause it sucked.".
Now on that basis lets take a good look at Marvel movies so far (don't assume i'm bashing these movies, i have the dvd for all them, and watch them alot and love them. But i'm giving credit where credit is due):
- Hulk = Trash in front of Man of steel. What was that? Was it even the hulk? Or a big buff green guy who can only throw tanks?
- Captain America : first avenger = Holy shit is this overwanked.. despite the immense corniness from Captain america running to the corniness of the plot and and the costume.. it was at best a 7 or 6 star movie..
- Ironman 1-3 : the only "depthful" superhero movie series Marvel actually has. Why? Because this is the movie that allowed them to compete with Batman. But taking it as a "superhero" comic movie.. still doesn't come at the level of Superman.. Especially the third one.
- Thor 1: Just no.. hardly a superhero comicbook movie.... seemed like a 30 minute short movie when you get done watching it.
- Thor 2: BEST COMIC BOOK Superhero movie made so far, i'm not gonna put this down.. this movie is easily above Man of Steel.
- Winter Soldier: I'll put it a little above Man of Steel, due to it under perfoming Captain America itself.. and the horrible character design.
NOW LETS TALK ABOUT THE BIG BOY THAT IS ALWAYS COMPARED TO MAN OF STEEL... AVENGERS:
1. plothole after plothole
2. Hardly any depth... just being honest
3. sissy ass Alien invasion
4. just had cool moments.. that is it pretty much..
5. The casting.. only 3 people were the correct cast out of the 6 or 7 of them. Fat fury = bad cast, Hawkeye = bad cast, RDJ = bad cast, Just like all those who have been cast as Batman were bad casts for BATMAN himself..until recently when they picked a 6'4" guy to play batman
You must be registered for see images
THIS IS NOT ME BASHING OR PUTTING DOWN THESE MOVIES.. THIS IS ME SIMPLY STATING WHAT I SEE FROM A "negative" point of view.
So there are about uh 2 movies that marvel has.. that are actually better than Man of steel.. when you talk about entertainment/ movie standards and build up alone.. So why does DC even need to trip about Marvel? They don't.... Marvel is marvel, Dc is Dc. So why judge one wayyy more harder than the other one?