Can you somehow prove he lacked knowledge
Obito outright
You must be registered for see links
at the fact that Minato was able to teleport to a moving kunai. There is not much more for me to prove here, as Obito's reaction all but tells you he did not know such a thing was possible.
. . . and was distracted?
Kakashi notes that controlling the Bijuu with his eyes
You must be registered for see links
- keep in mind that he was referring to lesser beasts, not the Kyuubi, the strongest of them all.
Minato also hints this when he says "
You must be registered for see links
," implying there is some form of strain keeping it under his control. Minato states this again
You must be registered for see links
.
Cause as far as we knew back then Obito was a grown man not a kid
How would Obito be a grown man 16 years ago?
Obito is Kakashi's age. Obito attacked the village the day Naruto was born. In Part 1, Kakashi was 26 and Naruto was 12 years old. That would mean that on the day Naruto was born, Kakashi was 14, maximum 15, putting Obito at a similar age.
And if we compare feats nothing points to Obito being in experienced with kamui or distracted by controlling the nine tails
So you are telling me that 15 years of experience does not lead to improvement, even marginally? Minato outright
You must be registered for see links
. It is logical to conclude that the only reason it did not reign supreme in that given encounter was due to the fact that it was in the hands of an inexperienced teenager.
Bottom-line:
Minato's FTG > no knowledge 14 year old Obito's (speed)
Kakashi's Kamui > full knowledge 30 year old Obito's (speed-wise)
Nothing above can lead you to the conclusion that Minato's FTG is decisively faster than Kakashi's Kamui, especially with Kakashi's latest feat of interrupting a summoning technique with his Kamui, which FTG is extremely similar to.