I quoted that particular part at first then answered the remaining quote later and merged both; Look at the time difference b/w last edit and the time of post.
I wonder if you ever bother reading my posts properly. What I've been complaining about is the fact that you put Pre G4 Luffy above Zoro. And I always made sure to put the notion " Pre G4" to avoid any confusion in the debate. So if anything, you were the one who was being unclear. Except for speed which by no means is enough to put pre G4 Luffy over Zoro, Pre G4 Luffy had nothing on Zoro. Zoro is clearly superior.
3. Lethality.....which still makes Zoro's attacks better for the most part right? Oda even said that Luffy & Zoro were equal in combat power(but that was why back in Water 7). We are pretty much saying that same thing but coming to an opposite conclusion but you condemn me for the results I come to.
I am not sure if I understand your stance here? Are you perhaps trying imply that power is the only thing that Zoro has over Luffy?
Well, that's what makes you biased here. He has far better attack power, more endurance, same level of reactions and reflexes. Zoro is certainly different from those with power alone. He doesn't lose speed to use his high end moves, unlike Luffy who'll become completely vulnerable in G3. I seriously have no idea how you could still consider Luffy superior.
It doesn't matter if it wasn't as big as a city. What matters here is the fact that it wasn't a direct hit. Zoro had to get past huge volume of rock in order to reach him. Hell, we don't even know if Zoro's aim was to hit his main body. You're supposed to make such a comparison when the attack was a clean hit.
Zoro doing what he did in such a short amount time should be taken as the testament of his quickness and speed. Dude, Are you serious with this one? Zoro is superior to Hyozou, far superior in every possible department. There is noway he wouldn't be able to react to Luffy. Where does this only feats talk came from? When I said Zoro looked superior to Luffy; I took all aspects into consideration. It was their overall display til that point. There wasn't a single thing (except for the fact that he is the main character) before chapter 777 that'd make Luffy look overall superior to Zoro. Even now, there isn't a single aspect about Pre G4 Luffy that'd make any rational reader believe that he is over all superior to Zoro.
You see that is the problem. You claim something that is completely debatable as obvious fact and use that to call others bias and question their intelligence.
-Zoro always has been more lethal & attacks more destructive & flashy. Did that put Zoro above Luffy pre-TS
-Zoro has always been more enduring & Luffy more durable but did that put Zoro above Luffy pre-TS?
-Zoro has always struggled against people who are more mobile, faster and/or versatile. Before you call BS without thinking, Daz Bones, Brahmin, Ohm, Kaku, Ryuma, Pica.
-We never seen Zoro fight people like Luffy or only seen him cut stone
-Stone is something Zoro could cut clean even Pre-TS. It offers no resistance because of how strong Zoro's slashes are. Ryuma & Zoro was cutting through stone buildings clean & their slashes didn't lose any power. Pica was hit clean & likely hit his abdominal area as he coughed blood. Again, it couldn't even take him out.
-Luffy also has gear stacking which increases the speed of G3.
-Zoro took a no name gravity attack from a casual Fujitora and was on one knee, breathing heavily & coughing blood. Zoro's counter slash was able to push Fujitora back but he blocked it no problem. Luffy took a Gravitou: Mukou from an angry Fujitora and only got a bunch of bruises. Luffy's G3 punch pushed Fujitora back but he blocked it no problem.
By no means is Zoro obviously superior Luffy and I seriously question you for saying that Zoro being stronger than G2/G3 Luffy is obvious. Its completely debatable and makes you yourself appear bias.