But gear 4 was useless as f*ckluffy still took dub and nami water was irreverent, so luffy> cracker >smoothie
![]()
You don't think first mates can fight on par with Admirals?It says "who could be the strongest", not "who is the strongest". It's not definite on the matter, especially since Cracker was mostly used as a measuring rod to show how Luffy matches up against the new enemies rather than a major threat on his own.
Anyway, the strongest enemy he's ever fought was eiither Aokiji, or Fujitora. Admirals tend to be stronger than Yonkou's subordinates, and he's 1v1ed both of them. (and technically he fought Kizaru/Akainu in the war, but that wasn't a proper fight).
Jack isn't the strongest Calamity.You don't think first mates can fight on par with Admirals?
Marco, Ben Beckmann, Jack, and Dogtooth seem like they'd end in a stalemate.
3/4 of the names I listed already fought admirals Jack fighting 3 of them and survived.
no not really it was just a bad match, because broot force doesn't work, zoro would be a better match up because he could cut themBut gear 4 was useless as f*ck
he actually beat him oda just made up a "fun" way to beat him by having luffy eat his cracker and in the end luffy came out with the dub2 years of training with the Dark King, Rayleigh himself, and still can't beat a measly 800 Zillion Rupee dude. What a letdown.
I got you.he actually beat him oda just made up a "fun" way to beat him by having luffy eat his cracker and in the end luffy came out with the dub
so hold this L![]()
All Rayleigh taught him was the basics of haki so don't know what you expect unless Rayleigh taught him something off the book2 years of training with the Dark King, Rayleigh himself, and still can't beat a measly 800 Zillion Rupee dude. What a letdown.
Yeah Zoro could have probably mid diffed Cracker.. a Yonko Commander lol.. it's really all about who's the better match up for some of these fights at the end of the day..no not really it was just a bad match, because broot force doesn't work, zoro would be a better match up because he could cut them
Rikudou Variah Tobi with the wrong information again. Original Japanese text was "His Haki is too hard.Yeah we know he's stronger, in the manga it said cracker's Haki is stronger.
According to Howlett and Cracker, Luffy brought down Doflamingo by himself though.. 1v1.... all alone..... :bdpf:Yeah Cracker has heaps of defense witch was very hard for luffy. Luffy couldnt of bet him on a 1v1. Yet again luffy couldnt be doffy in a 1v1.
Gear 4 did nothing to Cracker and inly way he won was water buy nami and Crackers weak body.
And as for Doflamingo, Luffy only won because of county came and saved him and made time for him plus Doflamingo was gama knifed.
Doflamingo was a all rounder with great durability and Cracker was a defence tank with spam and had a weak body.
Quote me where I said this *****According to Howlett and Cracker, Luffy brought down Doflamingo by himself though.. 1v1.... all alone..... :bdpf:
6 pages is too much to quote *****Quote me where I said this *****
Hard to quote something that was never said, huh?6 pages is too much to quote *****