No. Naruto is just being humble![]()
nope its a manga fact sasuke ms > sm narutoEither way, Naruto ROFL stomps Sasuke, now.
No. Naruto is just being humble![]()
nope its a manga fact sasuke ms > sm narutoEither way, Naruto ROFL stomps Sasuke, now.
I already proved that scan is worthless.nope its a manga fact sasuke ms > sm naruto
show me then.....O_OI already proved that scan is worthless.
How do ppl get "cutting through" from pierced? :|Raikiri isn't cutting through Susanoo ...
If a title says "Sasuke overpower Naruto" then it's a manga fact, otherwise...nope its a manga fact sasuke ms > sm naruto
1. IT means big ball rasengan. He calls it rasengan. But, to explain the fact that it's massive, he says big ball. Isn't this obvious to see?1. Because it's not the same technique, if it was he'd just call it Rasengan
2. Raikiri cuts Yata, why would I try to disprove something I'm defending?
3. What is this? Words, words said by characters such as Iruka stating Hiruzen was GOS. No, I want manga scans of feat not words. Until I do, Yata's hype is featless. I can easily provide, statements, scans and DB info to back up my argument, you however cannot as you will not find scans of Yata block nature infused jutsu.
4. Preta's hype has been proven, when has it failed to absorb jutsu/chakara?
5. Kishi logic is known as contradictary. If we follow your example of "proof" I can easily say that PS slash > Yata (which IMO I believe Yata can tank) because Madara said "Yata breaks all creation." Using character statements as proof instead of actual feats equals to flawed logic
I don't hate Itachi, in fact he's on of my fav chars (despite fanboys ruining his image) but I cannot stand when ppl hypocritical try to assert their arguments, prove it's logical and cannot except the same source as a fundamental basis
1. IT means big ball rasengan. He calls it rasengan. But, to explain the fact that it's massive, he says big ball. Isn't this obvious to see?
2. Good, raikiri cuts yata. Fine. What now? Both these techniques are described as having limitless potential -- "Cut's anything", "Reflects Anything". Therefore, since they both have no limits, it's possible raikiri can break through, or some sort of paradox occurs. I'm no physicist.
3. Cop out. Effortlessly blocked exploding tags and a sword. Therefore, this entire part is derailed as it's not featless. Stop using cheap cop outs. Show it being even remotely scratched, else the 'words' are as solid as any other evidence. Because your 'evidence' has been given more screen time and versatility, you're trying to use this as a cheap tactic. Furthermore, if you're trying to enforce Raikiri cuts anything, there are not enough scans to support this, and therefore you go off hype. Hence, Yata's hype has to be solidified to use that arguement. PS; Black zetsu (madara's will) who's seen countless shinobi's. Countless wars. Countless special items such as the gunbai and sage weapons, has much more credibility than iruka who's never left konoha.
TL;DR; Yata has reflected attacks, therefore it's hype is very possible as fact and this is just another cheap cop-out by you.
4. when has yata failed to deflect an attack? Can't say preta can absorb limitless, but yata can't block anything. Preta's never been pushed to the limits of it's hype. A V2 cloak isn't 'Limitless chakra'.
5. How does that make any sense? Do you live in NV? Do you have some sort of hidden book on the past 100 years of history of NV? Character statements are what tell the story. Kishi's logic is never contradictory to the point that it completely breaks jutsu's and their definitions. 'Madara said "Yata breaks all creation."' You even bring up this point. Madara has been through countless wars. He's been there through the creation of konoha and beyond. He's been there through the times of kin and gin. 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th world kages. Madara's seen and heard of everything the world has to offer. He knows of secret, legendary items. He knows of jutsu that revive the dead. He knows of jutsu that break space and time. The fact that yata's mirror comes from his mouth is more than enough proof. Yata needs no feat when it comes from such a credible source. The man's fodderizing an ENTIRE ninja alliance, and has a monster that took some god(So6P) to destroy. He's read the uchiha tablet - Something no one else has/can do because they don't possess EMS or rinnegan. Yata's Hype IS stone cold solidity because of yata. Using any other ninja's (iruka, kakashi, etc) debunked nonsense as proof is ZERO evidence to the contrary. FInd me a scan where MADARA HIMSELF made a contradiction.
The man who can fodderize Every single person, not including Hashirama, who exists within NV is the most credible source as to the hype of a jutsu. If he can't break it, who can? Who??
Itachi's fanboys have a logical reason to be radical. He has a weapon and shield that can reflect and defeat anything. attacks that can hardly be avoided. He's versatile in nin, tai and gen. Infact, itachi fanboys aren't bad at all. Even when they say he beats hashirama/juubi/so6P It makes perfect sense why they'd speak so absurdly. The man's hype is legendary. It's not their job to tell us how these people can beat itachi/exploit his weaknesses. It's our job. More importantly, it's our job to let obvious troll threads die. Trolls will always exist. Don't feed them.
Like i explicitly said. Don't feed them. They're obvious trolls. That doesn't make them a horrible fanboy. I've seen people call some itachi fans bad because they use logic that's actually in the manga.I didn't read all of your comment, but about the last part. Itachi fanboys are horrible. Especially the ones that just say "Itachi solos" and leave it at that. Their reasoning is atrocious, as if a character has to look into his eyes.:sy:
I am against AmaterasuGG due to the fact that the fastest target it hit was Danzo.The thing about these posts is that, the other person can't even defence how those attacks DO NOT end the fight.
Except Kamui has speed feats."Kamui GG" Is far worse IMO.
1. What part of not the same do you get? Similar doesn't mean it is the same. Are you claiming that a base Rasengan has the destructive power as a Chou Odoma Rasengan?1. IT means big ball rasengan. He calls it rasengan. But, to explain the fact that it's massive, he says big ball. Isn't this obvious to see?
2. Good, raikiri cuts yata. Fine. What now? Both these techniques are described as having limitless potential -- "Cut's anything", "Reflects Anything". Therefore, since they both have no limits, it's possible raikiri can break through, or some sort of paradox occurs. I'm no physicist.
3. Cop out. Effortlessly blocked exploding tags and a sword. Therefore, this entire part is derailed as it's not featless. Stop using cheap cop outs. Show it being even remotely scratched, else the 'words' are as solid as any other evidence. Because your 'evidence' has been given more screen time and versatility, you're trying to use this as a cheap tactic. Furthermore, if you're trying to enforce Raikiri cuts anything, there are not enough scans to support this, and therefore you go off hype. Hence, Yata's hype has to be solidified to use that arguement. PS; Black zetsu (madara's will) who's seen countless shinobi's. Countless wars. Countless special items such as the gunbai and sage weapons, has much more credibility than iruka who's never left konoha.
TL;DR; Yata has reflected attacks, therefore it's hype is very possible as fact and this is just another cheap cop-out by you.
4. when has yata failed to deflect an attack? Can't say preta can absorb limitless, but yata can't block anything. Preta's never been pushed to the limits of it's hype. A V2 cloak isn't 'Limitless chakra'.
5. How does that make any sense? Do you live in NV? Do you have some sort of hidden book on the past 100 years of history of NV? Character statements are what tell the story. Kishi's logic is never contradictory to the point that it completely breaks jutsu's and their definitions. 'Madara said "Yata breaks all creation."' You even bring up this point. Madara has been through countless wars. He's been there through the creation of konoha and beyond. He's been there through the times of kin and gin. 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th world kages. Madara's seen and heard of everything the world has to offer. He knows of secret, legendary items. He knows of jutsu that revive the dead. He knows of jutsu that break space and time. The fact that yata's mirror comes from his mouth is more than enough proof. Yata needs no feat when it comes from such a credible source. The man's fodderizing an ENTIRE ninja alliance, and has a monster that took some god(So6P) to destroy. He's read the uchiha tablet - Something no one else has/can do because they don't possess EMS or rinnegan. Yata's Hype IS stone cold solidity because of yata. Using any other ninja's (iruka, kakashi, etc) debunked nonsense as proof is ZERO evidence to the contrary. FInd me a scan where MADARA HIMSELF made a contradiction.
The man who can fodderize Every single person, not including Hashirama, who exists within NV is the most credible source as to the hype of a jutsu. If he can't break it, who can? Who??
Itachi's fanboys have a logical reason to be radical. He has a weapon and shield that can reflect and defeat anything. attacks that can hardly be avoided. He's versatile in nin, tai and gen. Infact, itachi fanboys aren't bad at all. Even when they say he beats hashirama/juubi/so6P It makes perfect sense why they'd speak so absurdly. The man's hype is legendary. It's not their job to tell us how these people can beat itachi/exploit his weaknesses. It's our job. More importantly, it's our job to let obvious troll threads die. Trolls will always exist. Don't feed them.
What does this have to do with the match at hand?naruto didn't even beat pain. kyubbi saved him and pain wasn't trying to kill
he doesn't and it was already proven to you in the other threadWhat does this have to do with the match at hand?
Pain beats Sasuke.
1. Dude, I've been referring to raikiri and chidori being similar this entire time. Same, Similar, wow big difference? ... You just bring it out like they use completely different methods and executions when the only difference is attack power. What does that change about the jutsu other than how far it can pierce? Exactly.1. What part of not the same do you get? Similar doesn't mean it is the same. Are you claiming that a base Rasengan has the destructive power as a Chou Odoma Rasengan?
2. Yes it is a paradox
3. Can you learn how to read? I'm not denying Yata's physical feats (hence, why I said I'd believe that Yata can tank a PS slash), I'm saying that you have no proof for it's ability to reflect any and all Nature based chakara attacks (which I stated in this line). Cheap tatics? More screen time? Don't get upset at me because Kishi displayed such a hyperbole and failed to back it up. I like how you just contradicted yourself here saying that Raikiri (admitting that there is manga proof to support its hype) should go off hype but solidifying Yata's hype when it is fearless in the reflection of nature based attacks. Quite biased if you asked me. Like I said, when you show me a scan backing yata's hype then I will agree with you until then, it is all assumption
4. When did I say it couldn't? I'm challenging your statement by demanding proof of your claims, you made the statement, now it is up to you to provide the proof and you are failing to do so. Your just making assumption out based off half of the feat of the DB. Like I said, it's contradictory, the manga has always been like that (E.G Ama burning hotter than the sun)
5. What manga have you been reading? |
First of all yata doesn't break all creation, Secondly, this series lives on contradiction and if you haven't observed this, then I suggest you read it back from chapter 1. Character statements DOES NOT EQUAL PROOF an example is Orochi had the Sword of Kusanagi which is also said to pierce all but failed to pierce 4-tailed Naruto. A man who researched Jutsu and did nothing but research was wrong about the weapon he possessed. I still see that you cannot provide me with manga proof and stay with your biased opinion.
Itachi fanboys say Itachi can solo the sage. The extreme fanboys have no credibility. Yet you all hold something in common you cannot back up Yata's (full) hype :|
Wow just wow, that's all I can say1. Dude, I've been referring to raikiri and chidori being similar this entire time. Same, Similar, wow big difference? ... You just bring it out like they use completely different methods and executions when the only difference is attack power. What does that change about the jutsu other than how far it can pierce? Exactly.
3. this coming from the guy who's misread my posts. Irony, it's here folks. "It can turn back ANY attack". If you can't understand what any means, then that's your business. Raikiri is probably a magic trick, and not an attack in that case. Furthermore, I was stating that you were the one saying raikiri can cut anything (completely based off hype since no manga fact to prove 'anything'.), yet trying to dispute yata's hype claims of blocking anything. Please don't try to insult me with 'learn to read' since you don't even read and understand my posts :|. Show me a scan backing raikiri's hype, Then i'll believe you. Until then, raikiri can't cut yata, therefore yata blocks the only attack you try to slyly claim breaks it.
4. Have you ever felt amaterasu? Ever been to the sun? No. Furthermore, amaterasu's hype wasn't disproved, now was it. Enton blocked gaara's sand. Enton made ay lose an arm. Amaterasu killed an undying dog.
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
It deflected all attacks aimed at it. Ergo, it proved it's hype. It's impossible to prove 'any'. Even if god himself shot it with a holy sniper rifle, and it didn't break, that would still not prove 'any'. Any means any. You can't prove any, you can only disprove it. Now disprove it or shut up. Stop trying to act like a smart ass, because you only come off as ignorant. Once again, you're left not answering my questions. I want 1 scan -- I have 3 solidifying my arguement -- of yata failing to block an attack. I just want to see a scratch or chip in yata.
5. "Sword of Kusanagi which is also said to pierce all but failed to pierce 4-tailed Naruto." Rofl you're making so much asspull to disprove yata. Nothing's been contradicted in the manga.You must be registered for see linkswe see the sword inside the kyuubi -- pierced.
You must be registered for see linkswe see the kyuubi holding back the sword so it won't go right through him. It pierces anything, not cuts the hand of anything trying to hold it back. Try again pl0x. Please bring up your next 'contradiction' and 'Similiar not same jutsu' examples.
"Character statements DOES NOT EQUAL PROOF" Oh yes it does. Unless you can show me a picture of you standing in NV. Until you can prove that you know more than the characters in their own world, I should presume they know alot more than you.
"Itachi fanboys say Itachi can solo the sage. The extreme fanboys have no credibility. Yet you all hold something in common you cannot back up Yata's (full) hype" I just did.
Can you prove god doesn't exist. Therefore he does.
What you're saying is that, because i cannot see it, i should assume it doesn't exist. Fine, Since i cannot see your brain, i'll assume you don't have one.
Disprove me or stop responding. These desperate posts of yours are getting redundant.
sharigan sees chakra1.Smoke bombs with sensing would do wonders against the sharingan.
2.If a wind style from a summons along with Danzo can destroy it, then so can sage ransenshuriken. Plus, it's not invincible. A single kick from Tsunade blew it open.
3.Naruto can use shadow clones in reserve and still get a lot in battle as proven in the current arc. He trained to use the 9 tails after the summit, not sage mode.
it"s was joke
I doubt naruto noticed his blindness...
Mhkay. . . ?
Naruto's pretty biased when he's convincing people to not go after Sasuke.
lol at all the co writers of naruto.Naruto underestimated himself.
Look into their arsenal, Naruto (SM) takes Sasuke (MS)
Sage Mode > MS Sasuke
Why Naruto (SM) > Sasuke (MS) :
Sasuke will engage Naruto in taijutsu first. Like always, he will get raped by Frog Katas. Frog Kata is far stronger than any normal tai jutsu, it wraps around the users body (like a chakra cloak, except natural energy), it gives the user increased strength in tai jutsu and a larger reach
Naruto has the speed to dodge Susanoo arrows and if people believes Sasuke can outlast Naruto.... There is a big diference between their stamina and chakra pool. Naruto can fight all day
Amaterasu is the only deal here, and Naruto has shown to be very tricky with Kage bunshins.
Naruto has better allies, he can summon Gamabunta, Gamaken, Gamahiro, Ma and Pa toads, these summons are far better than Sasuke's and Danzou's (They are actually smart, and very powerful)
Sasuke isn't getting out of their sound genjutsu, fuuton rasen shuriken destroys Susanoo
Naruto makes FRS faster than Susanoo arrow, plus his SM sensing, reflexes and speed, he can easily dodge it
SM Naruto is also extremely durable. He Shattered Pain's chakra disruption blades, falling on a bed of spikes without injury, his arm not being messed up during his Rasenshuriken perfection training?
You seem to dislike Naruto and don't want to give him any feats. Naruto's defeat of Pain and Kyubi puts him above MS Sasuke.
As for Amaterasu, Naruto will see Sasuke's eye bleeding and will prep a shadow clone to take the hit. Naruto is very tricky with KB's
SM Naruto > MS Sasuke
Didn't help Kakashi.sharigan sees chakra