1. Exactly how does the manga counter this? Every useful thing she's ever done could be done by Tsunade, that's a fact.
2. Exactly, she failed to surpass her own mentor, while Naruto and Sasuke became the strongest beings on the planet.
3. I don't get that statement. What, as in she knew she was codependent and didn't give a crap about how awful a person treats her?
4. Actually, no, Japan isn't greater than the entire fandom, besides which, I'm pretty sure Hinata has more fans in Japan anyway.
5. I'll give you that one.
6. And Sakura still managed to be the worst written, your point?
7. How did Obito have negative development? Becoming a villain isn't negative development, nor is redeeming oneself. I say Sakura gained negative development by the end of the series because she totally degraded as a character. The moment Sasuke came back she became "Sasky-kun" Sakura that let this man, this man that tried to kill her, insult her and treat her like she's filth to the point that Kakashi had to call him on his shit, and she still chose to marry him, at the very least sleep with him. That's pathetic, and she honestly had no reason whatsoever to love Sasuke, if any girl likes looks that badly she has some sort of issue.
0. I applaud your effort to combat the Sakura-wanking, but it's futile.
1. INCLUDING stuff like CPR.
There was ZERO need in making Sakura do it, apart from Kishi milking the red herring of the dead horse.
In contrast, Hinata (the "insignificant" SIDE character) has been used in several moments in a way that NOBODY ELSE could replace her (because she - a. mentioned HER LOVE for Naruto, which nobody else has; b. mentioned THEIR SHARED NINDO, which nobody else has either).
Funny, how a SIDE character is more IRREPLACEABLE than a MAIN one.
2. Slightly debatable, but the key point is that she is Tsunade's CLONE AT BEST.
She has NO jutsu that SHE herself made - and none that'd be her SIGNATURE MOVE (and NOT Tsunade's AS WELL).
Ah, which is what you meant anyways, lol.
3. I'll skip this one, but at least Obito had a Tobi phase, which was HILARIOUS.
Sakura was the crappy fangirl from chapter 3 till chapter 700 - and no amount of Super Strength had ever redeemed THAT.
4. The very fact that Hinata is compared to Sakura BY Sakura's OWN FANS, is enough.
5. Which still was Hinata, lol.
Plus, Toneri is Byakugan-related, NOT Byakugo, loool.
6. No point will ever negate this FACT.
Also, I personally don't consider Hinata to be that much BADLY written, cause I like her even the way she already is.
And actually, I don't even consider ANY other female in Naruto to be really BADLY written - only Sakura the FANGIRL.
Even Karin is made HILARIOUS in HER fangirlism (and the way she interacts with Suigetsu, for example).
Plus, Karin has the redeeming factor of being a NeoKushina - without the Plot no Jutsu of getting a Sannin for a teacher merely based on her "main" status (cause, really, WHY did Tsunade even take an apprentice to begin with?).
Sakura is rather PATHETIC and PITIFUL, though.
7. He kinda did, but it was never as awful as Sakura's relapses.
Obito's negative development is called "Rin", which reduced him from a funny and menacing villain to a stupid little boy that couldn't get over his crush's death.
Well, Sakura couldn't get over a villain who tried killing her twice and was an enemy by choice (Obito was pretty much manipulated into it, though it doesn't excuse his stupidity) - and what's 9000 times worse, she "loves" him LITERALLY FOR NO REASON.
THAT is a -9000 development in an instant.
Her reverting to her fangirl-mode EACH time she could sniff him (and the factual issue of her activating her ULTIMATE JUTSU in an way that is OBVIOUS to be her bragging in front of her Sasuke-KUN), isn't any better at all.
And I honestly can't fathom the stubborn fanaticism of Sakura-fappers.
Very. Seriously.
This is PATHETIC.