[Discussion] Can we deny evolution?

[Dreckerplayer]

You can say that you "deny" evolution, but still that doesn't make it less factual.

Or perhaps you wanted to ask whether the theory of evolution is falsifiable? Yes, a scientist whose name I can't remember stated that all it takes to falsify evolution would be the discovery of rabbit fossils in the Precambrian Era.

The point is, it's make-believe...literally. Every theory out there, is make-believe. 100%.

To make you believe that it's true.Like ancient folk-lore.

 

[Yeah right]

The point is, it's make-believe...literally. Every theory out there, is make-believe. 100%.

To make you believe that it's true.Like ancient folk-lore.

Wait, are you saying your theory (laymen version) that every theory is make believe, also make believe?
If so, we’re through the looking glass here people.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Wait, are you saying your theory (laymen version) that every theory is make believe, also make believe?
If so, we’re through the looking glass here people.

It's to make you believe, isn't it?If it's true, then you're simply laying down facts.

I was really speaking on theories regarding evolution.

 

[Our Lord Sasuke]

You can say that you "deny" evolution, but still that doesn't make it less factual.

Or perhaps you wanted to ask whether the theory of evolution is falsifiable? Yes, a scientist whose name I can't remember stated that all it takes to falsify evolution would be the discovery of rabbit fossils in the Precambrian Era.

Damn Sean Carroll

 

[Deadlift]

Damn Sean Carroll

I knew you would have liked it XD

 

[rollin]

You can deny it but evolution is obvious

 

[Dreckerplayer]

You can deny it but evolution is obvious

It's as obvious as presumed to be true.

 

[Lightbringer]

It's as obvious as presumed to be true.

The process of evolution is empirically proven.

Evolution is a fact because it has been observed in nature. The theory of evolution explains the mechanism of evolution, which is factually proven.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Knew you couldn't help yourself. Too much for you.

 

[Lightbringer]

Knew you couldn't help yourself. Too much for you.

And I knew you wouldn't have a constructive rebuttal to me debunking your falsehoods. Too much for you.

 

[Edogawa]

Whether evolution is true or false, this question can only be answered by people who are academically disciplined in science, so I wouldn't want to formulate an answer on a subject which I don't major in; contrary to certain others in this thread who are wannabes.

And the quotation is pretty stupid made by someone who is ironically stupid-intelligent at the same time. The heat of the sun is actually observable - you can see it, feel it and hear it. You can mathematically calculate it. Evolution is not observable so the comparison is scientifically illegitimate. Evolution is fundamentally a theory in the end, so it has data which support it and data which refute it as well. It's not classified as a fact until it is actually observable.

 

[HowDidIGetPrem]

Whether evolution is true or false, this question can only be answered by people who are academically disciplined in science, so I wouldn't want to formulate an answer on a subject which I don't major in; contrary to certain others in this thread who are wannabes.

And the quotation is pretty stupid made by someone who is ironically stupid-intelligent at the same time. The heat of the sun is actually observable - you can see it, feel it and hear it. You can mathematically calculate it. Evolution is not observable so the comparison is scientifically illegitimate. Evolution is fundamentally a theory in the end, so it has data which support it and data which refute it as well. It's not classified as a fact until it is actually observable.

Yes it is. Observing fossils' progressions from thousands of years ago to now is no worse than observing multi-million year old lights from distant stars.

 

[Lightbringer]

Whether evolution is true or false, this question can only be answered by people who are academically disciplined in science, so I wouldn't want to formulate an answer on a subject which I don't major in; contrary to certain others in this thread who are wannabes.

And the quotation is pretty stupid made by someone who is ironically stupid-intelligent at the same time. The heat of the sun is actually observable - you can see it, feel it and hear it. You can mathematically calculate it. Evolution is not observable so the comparison is scientifically illegitimate. Evolution is fundamentally a theory in the end, so it has data which support it and data which refute it as well. It's not classified as a fact until it is actually observable.

Evolution has been observed. The process of evolution is as legitimate as the heat of the sun.

The theory of evolution is the explanation of what evolution is and how it works, not whether or not it exists. It's existence has already been empirically proven.

 

[Punk Hazard]

It's still a theory.

Edit: I see I've upset some apes here. So then monkeys (as you claim to be descendents of them), how is it not a theory?

So much ignorance here.

1. Something being a "theory" doesn't mean it's a guess. There's no such thing as "just a theory." Evolution being classified as a theory in the scientific community means that there is an immense amount of evidence to support it.

2. No one said that human beings are descendants of "monkeys." Evolution means that there was an organism millions of years ago that evolved into multiple species today, including monkeys and apes. Human beings are one type of ape. Including you.

Whether evolution is true or false, this question can only be answered by people who are academically disciplined in science, so I wouldn't want to formulate an answer on a subject which I don't major in; contrary to certain others in this thread who are wannabes.

And the quotation is pretty stupid made by someone who is ironically stupid-intelligent at the same time. The heat of the sun is actually observable - you can see it, feel it and hear it. You can mathematically calculate it. Evolution is not observable so the comparison is scientifically illegitimate. Evolution is fundamentally a theory in the end, so it has data which support it and data which refute it as well. It's not classified as a fact until it is actually observable.

Evolution has been visibly observed multiple times. It's literally how your immune system and vaccines work, among other things.

 

[TheEvilOne]

O-o



I don't see how that makes him uneducated for not agreeing with evolution. That's a bit of an assumption.

Whether he agrees or not, it won't change the facts. Evolution has been proven to be true by numerous scientists so at this point its not even debatable. Soon we will have answers to everything. The time of religions is slowly coming to an end.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Your typical biased scientists and archeologists that are just wannabes.The theory of evolution, is pure arrogance. They're always depicted as white or native indian looking, they can't come up with anything else...it's all a hoax. They just distribute information that is only convenient for them, or makes them look good.

If they don't clutch onto something, they'll never understand their origins, since they're only depicted as white, and conveniently depicted as native Indian or oriental looking(which is just them stretching it, pushing their own agenda).It's just arrogance.

They lack substance, so what they do is, is they STRETCH IT, or exaggerate the evidence or representation of it. That whole evolution theory, is completely one-sided, self-beneficial, and made to make white people feel like the center of the universe. Lmao, they're only depicted as WHITE or bit middle eastern...it's a DISTORTION of reality, and a misrepresentation. How can anyone ELSE, take these people seriously...look at it...they lack substance.

Just like jesus being depicted as "white"...it's freaking ancient folk-lore. White supremacist agenda.

**** monkeys...

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Yes it is. Observing fossils' progressions from thousands of years ago to now is no worse than observing multi-million year old lights from distant stars.

This is called "kissing up", to be honest.

 

[HowDidIGetPrem]

Your typical biased scientists and archeologists that are just wannabes.The theory of evolution, is pure arrogance. They're always depicted as white or native indian looking, they can't come up with anything else...it's all a hoax. They just distribute information that is only convenient for them, or makes them look good.

If they don't clutch onto something, they'll never understand their origins, since they're only depicted as white, and conveniently depicted as native Indian or oriental looking(which is just them stretching it, pushing their own agenda).It's just arrogance.

They lack substance, so what they do is, is they STRETCH IT, or exaggerate the evidence or representation of it. That whole evolution theory, is completely one-sided, self-beneficial, and made to make white people feel like the center of the universe. Lmao, they're only depicted as WHITE or bit middle eastern...it's a DISTORTION of reality, and a misrepresentation. How can anyone ELSE, take these people seriously...look at it...they lack substance.

Just like jesus being depicted as "white"...it's freaking ancient folk-lore. White supremacist agenda.

**** monkeys...

You've got me convinced. And apes of all things? It's all just a ploy to liken us dark brothers to apes on color itself and color alone.
Nothing but a cheap shot to hack at others social standing because they can't raise their own.

This is called "kissing up", to be honest.

You mean kissing down. theyre beneath us man

 

[TheEvilOne]

You've got me convinced. And apes of all things? It's all just a ploy to liken us dark brothers to apes on color itself and color alone.
Nothing but a cheap shot to hack at others social standing because they can't raise their own.


You mean kissing down. theyre beneath us man

honestly this is just as bad as white supremacy ( which doesn't even exist in most countries, only in the mind of some uneducated folks ) if not worse.

 

[HowDidIGetPrem]

honestly this is just as bad as white supremacy ( which doesn't even exist in most countries, only in the mind of some uneducated folks ) if not worse.

manipulative and deceitful. you compare this recognition to white supremacy because you fear to recognize it.