Although a little clearer, this sounds like a biased argument, I'll need to check facts on this because it doesn't necessarily answer the question at hand. The base argument used for your POV is that these women raising dysfunctional boys are already dysfunctional themselves, meaning their choice in men probably wasn't the best, meaning they (the men) were probably lacking in character as well.Just having two parents doesn't make everything magically better. The parents have to be healthy themselves but what boys with single mothers do is they lack sufficient levels of self-esteem. They usually lack direction in life and easy to get them to do what you want. They have problems with the opposite *** when they grow up. They don't respect themselves and act weak + they have a hard time facing challenges in their life. These are usually the result of being raised by a single mother, the root problem being low self-esteem and no confidence. Most of the time, those single mothers have their own flaws that made them single mothers and it can be a very toxic environment for a young boy to grow up in.
To entertain your POV, wouldn't the low self-esteem only pose in issue while the boy is still just a boy? It is common for teenage children, boys and girls alike to question themselves while among their peers, self-esteem issues can come from many different sources at that age that do not reside in the home, and although men can give them direction, it is up to the individual themselves to realize their own potential. I believe a strong woman can help realize that potential as well, where does a woman fail where a man succeeds if she has the necessary tools (remember, she's not some basic bich who made poor choices).
So lets skip the flaws that would make most of your arguments basic platform, and say the woman is perfectly normal, can she raise the son to be a man, and first, what is your definition of a man?
Last edited: