- Joined
- Mar 9, 2014
- Messages
- 3,294
- Reaction score
- 297
Title.
All the major villains lost in the most ridiculous forced way.
All the major villains lost in the most ridiculous forced way.
It is pretty much like Infinite Mugen said. The villain has to be stronger than the hero. Otherwise, what is the point? Can you imagine if Kishi wrote Madara to be about Kiba level? How pathetic would that be?
Is that really what you want?
Naruto should've died against Pain
Neither of them should have survived the Land of waves arc.
Haku was throwing his needles at non vitals the entire time, and they nerfed Zabuza greatly.
can a villain win if the hero has killing intent?
Hashirama held back against Madara
Hiruzen held back against Oro
Jaraiya held back against Itachi
Naruto held back against Sasuke
Guy held back against Itachi
Itachi held back against Sasuke
With hero killing intent and bloodlust, Naruto would've ended 95% of all shinobi himself
The fix would be as easy as having the hero battle against a villain that's on roughly the same level.
I dont know but Zabuza was nerfed in that second fight
That's lame and unrealistic for every villain to be less than or equal to the hero. That leaves no room for the hero to actually overcome some real adversity.
Plus, that is pretty hard to pull off in a series like Naruto where power levels are based on what kind of specific jutsus you have. It would be easier to pull this off in Dragon Ball where power level is literally just how much ki you have for the most part. In Dragon Ball's case, all you have to do is just give the enemy around the same amount of ki/raw power as the hero and you're set (Super Saiyan Blue Goku vs Golden Frieza was more or less a prime example of this).
However, power isn't as quantifiable with the way powers work in Naruto, and abc logic isn't as applicable.
Also, another reason why that is a bad idea:
Why should someone such as a legendary clan leader who is hyped up for the whole manga and who has about a century worth of experience and who grew up in the era of warring states, be equal to some 16 year old kid?
Why should the progenitor of chakara, the juubi itself, the mother of the sage of the six paths, be equal to some 16 year old kid?
Why should any major antagonist really (initially) be at the same level as the hero? (I say initially because it is fine if the hero powers up mid battle to reach the opponent's level, like how Goku got Ultra Instinct and reached/surpassed Jiren).
It just makes no sense and is bad writing.
can a villain win if the hero has killing intent?
Hashirama held back against Madara
Hiruzen held back against Oro
Jaraiya held back against Itachi
Naruto held back against Sasuke
Guy held back against Itachi
Itachi held back against Sasuke
With hero killing intent and bloodlust, Naruto would've ended 95% of all shinobi himself