Black Ops vs Modern Warfare 2
- Thread starter Itachi Perfect Mangekyo
- Start date
Universal Enlightenment
Active member
Awards
Alphonse Elric
Active member
Black ops mainly because of zombies. I <3 my zombies. I want the new map pack to come out for ps3 already. 
Itachi Perfect Mangekyo
Member
AwesomeBoba
Member
I'm begging Treyarch not to make another OD game. I mean the campaign and zombies were decent, but they tried a new template for multiplayer, which sucked.
-The Agent-
Active member
Campaign mode goes to Black ops
Multiplayer is split.
Black Ops- More balanced, every thing implemented can be cancelled out. For example Ghost counters spy plant. Black bird counters ghost pro. Counter spy plane counters black bird. I love how the chopper gunner looks in the game. They reduced the grenade launchers to make it a balanced game. Thats one thing I really love about Black Ops. Perks are more interesting Example: Hardline Pro, Hacker Pro, adding Flak jacket etc. Redundant Killstreaks Chopper gunner and Gunship, virtually the same type of kill streak except one you pilot. They could have added a better kill streak for an 11 KS.
Modern Warfare 2- maps were more fun to play on, less camping corners, more places to snipe from, and play different strategies. Even the maps I hated on MW2 are better than some maps on Black Ops. I love how Killstreaks stack up though. The kill streaks are more exciting as well. AC 130,EMP, Nuke> Gunship,Dogs, and Chopper gunner. In MW2 if the airspace was full you could still call in a pave low on stand by to access other kill streaks. It sucks in Black ops when I can't call in my chopper because there is a helicopter in the air.
Although its not a big deal but spawn music in black ops sucks, makes me cringe almost every time i hear it xd
With that being said, Black Ops is the better multi player but MW2 was more fun to play on.
I could go on more but Its getting late here I'll post more tomorrow.
Multiplayer is split.
Black Ops- More balanced, every thing implemented can be cancelled out. For example Ghost counters spy plant. Black bird counters ghost pro. Counter spy plane counters black bird. I love how the chopper gunner looks in the game. They reduced the grenade launchers to make it a balanced game. Thats one thing I really love about Black Ops. Perks are more interesting Example: Hardline Pro, Hacker Pro, adding Flak jacket etc. Redundant Killstreaks Chopper gunner and Gunship, virtually the same type of kill streak except one you pilot. They could have added a better kill streak for an 11 KS.
Modern Warfare 2- maps were more fun to play on, less camping corners, more places to snipe from, and play different strategies. Even the maps I hated on MW2 are better than some maps on Black Ops. I love how Killstreaks stack up though. The kill streaks are more exciting as well. AC 130,EMP, Nuke> Gunship,Dogs, and Chopper gunner. In MW2 if the airspace was full you could still call in a pave low on stand by to access other kill streaks. It sucks in Black ops when I can't call in my chopper because there is a helicopter in the air.
Although its not a big deal but spawn music in black ops sucks, makes me cringe almost every time i hear it xd
With that being said, Black Ops is the better multi player but MW2 was more fun to play on.
I could go on more but Its getting late here I'll post more tomorrow.
It's all about what YOU personally like/want.
You can't say "This is better and that suxxx!!111!!" just because you like the other one better and has the features you like.
People always ignore the game itself. Graphics, motorics, gameplay features etc etc.
To me, I like them both. They are very much alike and on both games you get to shoot people with a massive range of weapons.
So I don't see the big fuss here
And besides I personally enjoy 1st person shooters on PC.
You can't say "This is better and that suxxx!!111!!" just because you like the other one better and has the features you like.
People always ignore the game itself. Graphics, motorics, gameplay features etc etc.
To me, I like them both. They are very much alike and on both games you get to shoot people with a massive range of weapons.
So I don't see the big fuss here
And besides I personally enjoy 1st person shooters on PC.
McKnockout
Active member
Awards
I'd have to go with MW2
In this game too much camping with ghost and motion sensors. In MW2 their was also camping but tons of ways to get people out. I find it really funny people who have a K/D ratio of 2.00 or higher and they have only a kill streak of 18 or lower (Can someone say campers and dash boarders). I've played this more than any COD game I first started with WaW and after that I played MW2 but I didn't spend to much time on them. I played WaW for only like 17 hrs or something was lvl 43 and than MW2 I spent more time on playing till at least 3rd presitage. This game I play much more because I'm bored now a days and I have nothing else to play at the moment.
Overall thou COD: 4 was the best played that for only 3 hours but the game was so plain and simple kill streaks where decent and maps were great (less campers).
In this game too much camping with ghost and motion sensors. In MW2 their was also camping but tons of ways to get people out. I find it really funny people who have a K/D ratio of 2.00 or higher and they have only a kill streak of 18 or lower (Can someone say campers and dash boarders). I've played this more than any COD game I first started with WaW and after that I played MW2 but I didn't spend to much time on them. I played WaW for only like 17 hrs or something was lvl 43 and than MW2 I spent more time on playing till at least 3rd presitage. This game I play much more because I'm bored now a days and I have nothing else to play at the moment.
Overall thou COD: 4 was the best played that for only 3 hours but the game was so plain and simple kill streaks where decent and maps were great (less campers).
Last edited:
waynexhyped96
Member
black ops-zombies/campaign
modern warfare 2-multiplayer
but i choose mw2 because its more fun to play.. to me, also because the killstreaks are worth striving for and you feel like you've accomplished something to brag about when you get a nuke xd
modern warfare 2-multiplayer
but i choose mw2 because its more fun to play.. to me, also because the killstreaks are worth striving for and you feel like you've accomplished something to brag about when you get a nuke xd
kisamexRocks
Active member
Treyarch isn't good at making online games. BO is fun too play but the online is complete trash. MW2 is good but the way they don't fix the game is kinda stupid. Pathetic if you ask me. Although story wise it's Black ops, there is zombies, split screen online, and theatre, but personally for me, the way the game looks isn't really good. Graphics wise, it's BARELY an upgrade from World At War.