chopstickchakra
Active member
Saying it again doesn't make it less of a bad analogy. You're coming to our conclusion based on a single factor.
[VS] Big mom and Marco vs Mihawk and Luffy
- Thread starter Sakazuki
- Start date
Imo in one piece. Let's say dragon can beat the strongest admiral, not saying he can, but if he could, than yes I would say dragon > every single person but which ever yonkos could also beat the strongest admiral
Or let's say, kizaru could beat Rayleigh, not saying he can, but if he could it would make more sense, that Rayleigh would still have a better chance than kizaru facing bb as kizaru has a df, but nope I still think kizaru would end up pwning blackbeard harder than Rayleigh could in a different way, if he could beat Rayleigh in a one on one
Last edited:
chopstickchakra
Active member
But Law can't beat Doffy so what does any of this have to do with asserting Law>Jozu because Law avoided parasite and Jozu didn't(I don't actually remember Doffy targeting Law with parasite but that's besides the point)
You're allowed to keep on thinking that but it's not a good method of determining who could beat who is all I'm saying.