It's not certain, he is mischievous at least, I think.Is Loki full-on bad again? I haven't seen Thor Ragnarok yet.
In terms of spectacle, yeah. But objectively every year has much better movies than anything in the superhero genre.Sh!t just got real...
Aiming to be one of the, if not the best movie of 2018 hands down.
It's going to be awesome.
2018? One of the best movies of all time is probably more like it. Maybe not in terms of actual content, but hey that's the case for most of the highest-grossing movies. The trailer alone is already breaking records.Sh!t just got real...
Aiming to be one of the, if not the best movie of 2018 hands down.
It's going to be awesome.
It's cinematic history in the making, it has got the whole package. Even if you're not a fan of this kind of movies, that doesn't take away it's a project without precedent.You must be registered for see images
Are y'all for real?, I don't see what's interesting about it tbh.
Maybe, but that's not how it works. The primary purpose of a movie these days is to awe and entertain people and that's exactly what this franchise does. I mean you can wonder what exactly the point is in being an "objectively" better movie, but making far less money and being far less popular.In terms of spectacle, yeah. But objectively every year has much better movies than anything in the superhero genre.
That's not how I see it. Superhero movies and Star Wars are the most popular blockbusters nowadays, and while they are definitely entertaining, they are not the pinnacle of film making by any means. Just because something appeals to majority of the people doesn't make it the best thing.Maybe, but that's not how it works. The primary purpose of a movie these days is to awe and entertain people and that's exactly what this franchise does. I mean you can wonder what exactly the point is in being an "objectively" better movie, but making far less money and being far less popular.
You're thinking like every Hollywood exec, which is why there's less original movies nowadays.I mean you can wonder what exactly the point is in being an "objectively" better movie, but making far less money and being far less popular.
That's your personal, subjective opinion, which is contradictory to your claim of talking about "objectively" better movies as what is supposed to be the pinnacle of movie making? Being original doesn't make something good, likewise being not-original is not automatically a bad thing. Movies, like anything else, are subjugated to trends and interests, which can change over time. Some movies originally considered failures became classics while others received the opposite fate. Themes that were ones highly popular are now considered to be dull while new ones take their place...and that cycle repeats itself.That's not how I see it. Superhero movies and Star Wars are the most popular blockbusters nowadays, and while they are definitely entertaining, they are not the pinnacle of film making by any means. Just because something appeals to majority of the people doesn't make it the best thing.
You're thinking like every Hollywood exec, which is why there's less original movies nowadays.