itz Arizona idk why many are suprised that once agian they piss alot of people off with their crazy ideas
if thatt the case those 2 overreacted he gave them an address where they could go and the other place probably would have put the little figures that would eventually be thrown away on top sheesh!Correct me if i'm wrong, but I think everything came from the issue with a bakery:
Apparently, a gay couple wanted the baker to make their cake. He made it, however refused to add the 2 men on top of the cake, and offered alternatives. He even gave them a competitor's address and number and asked them to go there. The gay couple filed a lawsuit and won.
So I think the law was created to protect businesses from that. As the baker wasn't in the wrong, as it was against his beliefs.
For people who don't understand the baker's perspective:
If you're an atheist, imagine being sued because you didn't pray. (hypothetically)
People don't see the issue with this.Besides one guy in this thread it seems like the majority of people have sense enough to see the issue with this. The governor vetoed it, this law isn't happening.
*rolls eyes*You must be registered for see links
To quote the governor, “Going forward let’s turn the ugliness over Senate bill 1062 into a greater search for greater respect and understanding among all Arizonans and Americans.”
The bolded is the only thing that was even substantial enough to make it look like this law was passed with actual logic appllied to it. The reason seperation of powers exists in the government is to make sure the Government doesn't have too much power. Now Government can strip tax paying citizens of their rights and use God as a reason for it.Arizona's Legislature has passed a controversial bill that would allow business owners, as long as they assert their religious beliefs, to deny service to gay and lesbian customers.
Which is why we don't use the law for our social and moral whims.Why can't people see that this is nothing but segregation and oppression? Gays are quickly having their natural born rights stolen from under us. In Russia its's not legal to be gay or associated with gays. Just for being gay, you could seve up to a 10 year term in jail.
Stop.This isn't freedon of Religion, it's oppression. Gay men and women pay thier taxes just kike any other citizen of the United States of the America. To be slowly put surely seperated by society is just disgusting and pitiful.
So... you have the right to walk into my business (which may very well be in my home) and tell me how and what I am going to do for you?The bolded is the only thing that was even substantial enough to make it look like this law was passed with actual logic apllied to it. The reason seperation of powers exist in the government is to make sure the Government didn't have too much power. Now Government can strip tax paying citizens of their rights and use God as a reason for it.
Yes, yes. Preach about the undesirables and how we need to do something about them.If people are to continue to use God's name is vain like this, religion is sure to soon rule over the US in not time. The people who strip away their dignity and individuality just to make other humans suffer are disgusting.
People are the cause of war.Religion can sometime be a cause for war. it's really easy to see where an action like this will go.
The same bill has been introduced in my state.Well it's not being passed,so nothing to worry about.
Rights are being quickly stolen from you? You call a tons of states legalizing gay marriage right being quickly stolen? Just some parts of the world have this. Don't overplay being the victim. Technically there's no gay rights which is what all these debates are about what right to give and what not.Why can't people see that this is nothing but segregation and oppression? Gays are quickly having our natural born rights stolen from under us. In Russia its's illegal to be gay or associated with gays. Just for being gay, you could serve up to a 10 year term in jail.
This isn't freedon of Religion, it's oppression. Gay men and women pay thier taxes just like any other citizen of the United States of the America. To be slowly put surely seperated by society is just disgusting and pitiful.
The bolded is the only thing that was even substantial enough to make it look like this law was passed with actual logic appllied to it. The reason seperation of powers exists in the government is to make sure the Government doesn't have too much power. Now Government can strip tax paying citizens of their rights and use God as a reason for it.
If people are to continue to use God's name is vain like this, religion is sure to soon rule over the US in not time. The people who strip away their dignity and individuality just to make other humans suffer are disgusting.
Religion can sometime be a cause for war. it's really easy to see where an action like this will go.
@bolded That's no more than giving us a right that should not have to be fought for, as it is a natural right. There shouldn't have to be "gay rights:, but just rights in general. To prefer the rights that gays seek as "gay rights", are suggesting that those very rights don't belong to us naturally imho. Seeing people with rights (that should belong to everyone) that you don't have can do something to a person. You see the stunt Arizona tried to pull right? Their oppressing the gay community and theres nothing we can do about it but protest! So yes, our rights are being stolen, and we continuously have to fight for them back.Rights are being quickly stolen from you? You call a tons of states legalizing gay marriage right being quickly stolen? Just some parts of the world have this. Don't overplay being the victim. Technically there's no gay rights which is what all these debates are about what right to give and what not.
If this law means all services can be restricted, then yeah it's too far, but there are some areas where something like this is needed. For instance, wedding processions held by churches should not be forced to marry a gay couple or be sued because they didn't do it. If Gay marriage is being added to society, then measures must be taken to protect beliefs of religions that think it's wrong and not to be forced to condone the practice through a service. Of course this shouldn't be applied to all services.
Please, explain to me how Airzona was oppressing you.@bolded That's no more than giving us a right that should not have to be fought for, as it is a natural right. There shouldn't have to be "gay rights:, but just rights in general. To prefer the rights that gays seek as "gay rights", are suggesting that those very rights don't belong to us naturally imho. Seeing people with rights (that should belong to everyone) that you don't have can do something to a person. You see the stunt Arizona tried to pull right? Their oppressing the gay community and theres nothing we can do about it but protest! So yes, our rights are being stolen, and we continuously have to fight for them back.
The law should not have have to be written, because it is already a right of every business owner.It's already a bit too far giving businesses the right to decline gay customers. I could understand the church thing, but then the gay couple just needs to understand and leave it alone. Not all gay people are trying to force people/businesses to do whatever. To make a law on something so pity though? Having being completely centered around one group is unconstitutional and is discrimination. If this law was to be passed with the includion of other groups, it would still be BS no doubt, but alteast it would've made their religious exscuse less crappier (not by much tbh). Because, think about it, maybe a jewish couple (straight btw) went to a church and asked to have their wedding their, but the church refused. Should there be a law centered on making sure that the jews can and will be declined state wide if the business decides to?
*shrug*Like I said, it's oppression to the gay community. Any instance you were to think up could be appllied to any group and would make this law look like the BS it is.
You have the right to do what you like, period. Religion doesn't need to be affiliated.This just proves that religious freedom doesn't give you the right to do what you like, under the guise of your "religion".
You can scream in my face all you want to. I will let you go hoarse.In that case, I would create a new religion called Kittytron, and Kittenites must obey the sacred litter box. Also, any kittenites who converse with conservatives must scream in their face till the unholy conservative leaves, or they pass out from exhaustion. My religious freedom allows me to do as I like.
Exactly, but why allow people to discriminate because of another's sexuality. If the individual is causing a scene then yes, refuse service. There is a difference between being a bigot and religious.You have the right to do what you like, period. Religion doesn't need to be affiliated.
I agree, and I think that is wrong. What matters is the premise behind refusing service. Also, any business that is state funded/ in town limits or receives any type of government support at all, shouldn't be allowed to refuse any service offered to any (law abiding) American, based on personal opinion.There is only one caveat: you cannot force or defraud others into relinquishing their belongings or service. That's it.
Ughh... I hate loud sounds, that was just an example of how based on the defense put forth by religious groups, anyone could do anything under the guise of religion. The line is drawn when it's discrimination.You can scream in my face all you want to. I will let you go hoarse.
I personally don't care about private businesses, they can do as they please. The issue is any business that has some type of state/government affiliation. If I'm paying taxes to help your business, you will not refuse me service based on your opinion of my sexuality.I would not recommend coming into my restaurant or asking me to do any kind of maintenance work on your house, though. The refusal to have anything to do with you would just piss you off even more.
Why bring children into this? If you don't wish to expose your children to modern beliefs then home school them and never let them go out in public. Homosexuality isn't a crime, and will not be treated as such. Discrimination is a crime, and if that's how you choose to raise your children, then that's on you.I really only care about your affairs when you start trying to tell me or my children what to do. Then things are, as they say, 'real.'
And you will not tell me what to do in my business. You will not tell my children what they will do in theirs.
I will not tell you what to do in your business, or your children what to do in theirs. I want you and your children to have every motivation and realistic opportunity to start independent businesses no matter how small or large - and that you succeed.
Most of these issues with gay people are unorthodox, and obsolete. I will promise you that in 100 years, it will be a forgotten issue and the descendants of most who needlessly discriminate against gay people, will know very little that is was ever an issue.I want that for everyone. The more successful everyone is - the more opportunities await me and my children. But a complacent and oppressive society will find that I do not value the lives of narrow-minded drones that do little but punch a clock and meddle in the affairs of others.
@bolded That's no more than giving us a right that should not have to be fought for, as it is a natural right. There shouldn't have to be "gay rights:, but just rights in general. To prefer the rights that gays seek as "gay rights", are suggesting that those very rights don't belong to us naturally imho. Seeing people with rights (that should belong to everyone) that you don't have can do something to a person. You see the stunt Arizona tried to pull right? Their oppressing the gay community and theres nothing we can do about it but protest! So yes, our rights are being stolen, and we continuously have to fight for them back.
It's already a bit too far giving businesses the right to decline gay customers. I could understand the church thing, but then the gay couple just needs to understand and leave it alone. Not all gay people are trying to force people/businesses to do whatever. To make a law on something so pity though? Having being completely centered around one group is unconstitutional and is discrimination. If this law was to be passed with the includion of other groups, it would still be BS no doubt, but alteast it would've made their religious exscuse less crappier (not by much tbh). Because, think about it, maybe a jewish couple (straight btw) went to a church and asked to have their wedding their, but the church refused. Should there be a law centered on making sure that the jews can and will be declined state wide if the business decides to?
'
Like I said, it's oppression to the gay community. Any instance you were to think up could be appllied to any group and would make this law look like the BS it is.
I believe marriage is to be between two people who love each other. Saying were not meant to marry is like saying were not meant to love. Who are you to tell anyone who they can and cannot love. That'a literally their personal business. Something you have no right to intrude on tbh.Marriage is not between 2 men, but a man and a woman, so no, gay marriage is not a naturally given right. Personally I think Gay marriage should have another name since it kinda destroys the meaning of marriage. I mean, just a simple term change. You can have special rights for all I care, but I don't like the fact that homosexuality is being considered "marriage" when it's meant to be between a man and a woman.
The church thing is really the only thing I'd push for to be honest, but I think the right to refuse services may very well be in the constitution.
I believe marriage is to be between two people who love each other. Saying were not meant to marry is like saying were not meant to love. Who are you to tell anyone who they can and cannot love. That'a literally their personal business. Something you have no right to intrude on tbh.
Again, that same instance can be played with any party or group.
In the end, I just see that as you using religion as a reason to say Homosexuality is so wrong. Theres literally no other note worthy reason as to why being gay is so wrong.Well from the Christian perspective, no, you're not supposed to love another guy since homosexuality is a sin. I don't think there's been a culture that has considered marriage to be between 2 people that love each other regardless of gender. It always has been with a man and a woman. From the Christian perspective, it's a symbolism of God and humanity on earth, so homosexual marriage shouldn't be called the same thing as what has already been set in stone as marriage across history.