No, because a large majority of them are hypocrites.
This statement reeks of ignorance. You simply pay most attention to the extremists and apply their fraction to the whole.
It truly is the majority.
No it's not. Educate yourself.
Deep down no girl wants full equality between the two, like if a woman hits a man they dont expect to be hit back but when they get hit they get all mad and sue and make a big commotion about it .
arent women already equal? lol
No. If they want equality, then it should be called a "humanist" or an "equalist" not a "feminist" because that sounds like female dominance over males rather than equality.
If we go by your definition, then yes, I am a feminist.
Personally I feel like, if a woman hits you she is acting like trash. It's a double standard to me. Just because you have a vagina doesn't give you the right to hit somebody. What comes around goes around. If you hit somebody, don't expect every male to bow down to you and do nothing. Hitting someone is just disrespectful regardless of gender. If women want to have special privileges against males, they shouldn't have equal pay or anything else. Women want the best of both worlds. You can't expect to get equal treatment in the work force, and get special treatment. Like wtf that's so bias and sexist.Deep down no girl wants full equality between the two, like if a woman hits a man they dont expect to be hit back but when they get hit they get all mad and sue and make a big commotion about it .
Exactly. For me it's about how women are treated in the workforce, not about relationships.
I like an old fashioned gentlemen who will hold the door for me, or if I'm asked on a date, pay for the meal or movie. If it's with guy friends, I will pay or we split, but not a bf. My family was taught to serve the men of the home too, so it's bred into me as well.
Yea I disagree with you. Most of my family have that belief too. I truly dislike traditional family values.
Holding the door and stuff is being polite. Like if a woman is at the door first she can walk in. She doesn't have to wait for someone to open the door. (Women agree with this too) Paying for meals is whoever wants to pay. Like if a guy ask a girl out, he should pay because he asked her out first. If a girl asked a guy out, she should pay same thing. Boyfriend/girlfriend and married couples have their own way of paying for stuff, so I won't speak on that.
Serve men? Yea I would hate that. I like strong independent women. Not a submissive woman who abides by her man every thought.
I believe relationships should be 50/50. And I will raise my kids to think the same.
Feminazis just want woman to become equal to men when it benefits them, but when it comes to stuff like men being able to hit a woman back and both sexes having chivalry they don't complain about that.
Oh okay I see.I agree with you, but what I was raised into doing is stuck with me unfortunately. Only when it's family related tho. Luckily we don't have many gatherings. I used to have to serve all my uncle's and male cousins when I was a young teen.
Oh yeah I agree about who asks who out should pay, but for me, I never ask a guy out because I don't like dating. Lol and the door stuff is because all my female friends that are feminist in the bad way will actually snap at a guy if he holds the door. It's terrible. And I like a guy that does that for a lady because nowadays all you see are guys letting doors go in women's faces, while they hold it for other men. That's what I see all the time where I live anyways.
Oh okay I see.
I LOL at the serve your uncles. I would've been like hell no. I barley like fixing my own plate.
Men letting a door go in a woman's face, never happens here. Everyone holds the door for you, which I like.
I know. I was like 13 and serving all my uncle's who I hardly even knew. XD Our family is French and it's always been tradition.
You're lucky! Chivalry is dead in Ontario.
Look on the bright side, women will start opening the door for you now xD
Reversed roles lol
Men hitting women is not about equality, women are physically weaker, much easier hurt than men, have a lower pain threshold and most are completely unable to protect themselves against men efficiently. Saying it is OK for a man to hit a woman is like saying it is OK to hit an old person.
If a women hits a man in the jaw she is libal to give him a bruise if he hits her back he is libel to break her jaw, a man can control a woman with violence, take away her liberty, voice, freedom, happiness, how many men do you think a woman has ever controlled with violence? Very few. That is why it is not OK for a man to hit a women, most men are totally capable of restraining a women without hitting her, unless she is very strong or he is very weak.
However, it is not OK for a woman to hit a man either, it isn't OK for anyone to hit anyone but this is the explanation of why no man should ever hit a woman back unless she is literally trying to really hurt him, because women are much easier hurt and much physically weaker.
There is also a difference between gender equality, gender roles and differences between the sexes. For a woman to say it is sexist to be a housewife for instance is utter rot, most women have a natural drive to care for there husbands and boyfriends and children,however wanting to is not sexiest being expected to is, there are biological gender roles that will not change because they are genetic but they have no baring on equality.