- Joined
- Dec 7, 2012
- Messages
- 5,982
- Reaction score
- 787
This is the theory I came up with a few months ago when walking down my street.
You take a chimpanzee and you take a human baby. You feed both of them correctly and try and teach them the same things with the same methods. After 5 years, I think it would be safe to assume that the baby would be more intelligent than the Chimpanzee.
What does this mean?
This means that if this can happen when the circumstances are same and a human can be superior because of it’s chemistry or genetics then It suggests that some people can be born smarter. If someone can be born “retarded” or incapable of complex thoughts then is it fair to assume the opposite can happen?
There are 7 billion people on the planet, not every single one of them is born with the same chemical balance and genetics. Some people are tall , some people are short and just like that way some people are born smart and some are not. I think when it comes to intelligence the reason people don’t admit this so easy is because they don’t want to be on the lower end or they don’t want to admit that other people are smarter than them.
However I think this part is very important: One person said that he could raise a healthy baby to go in any career, Lawyer,Doctor, Bin man or even an artist. I think the reason for this is because ones intelligence can be improved and normally the improvement potential is ENOUGH to be able to work in a certain field.
What this means is that If I have an IQ of 100, I can quite potentially raise it to 115 or maybe even 120 which would mean that I am capable of mastering or going into generally any profession. This means that development is possible when it comes to intelligence but it’s not all development and it’s not ALL about being born smart. Generally the development is enough to get you where you need to be.
You take a chimpanzee and you take a human baby. You feed both of them correctly and try and teach them the same things with the same methods. After 5 years, I think it would be safe to assume that the baby would be more intelligent than the Chimpanzee.
What does this mean?
This means that if this can happen when the circumstances are same and a human can be superior because of it’s chemistry or genetics then It suggests that some people can be born smarter. If someone can be born “retarded” or incapable of complex thoughts then is it fair to assume the opposite can happen?
There are 7 billion people on the planet, not every single one of them is born with the same chemical balance and genetics. Some people are tall , some people are short and just like that way some people are born smart and some are not. I think when it comes to intelligence the reason people don’t admit this so easy is because they don’t want to be on the lower end or they don’t want to admit that other people are smarter than them.
However I think this part is very important: One person said that he could raise a healthy baby to go in any career, Lawyer,Doctor, Bin man or even an artist. I think the reason for this is because ones intelligence can be improved and normally the improvement potential is ENOUGH to be able to work in a certain field.
What this means is that If I have an IQ of 100, I can quite potentially raise it to 115 or maybe even 120 which would mean that I am capable of mastering or going into generally any profession. This means that development is possible when it comes to intelligence but it’s not all development and it’s not ALL about being born smart. Generally the development is enough to get you where you need to be.