It's somewhat uncommon, but in terms of Indies, is probably second to Survivor in terms of how much use it gets. This is of course where you don't include Serial as Indie, which is more common than both.
This doesn't really stand up to reason. It being mentioned in the previous game, and not being included, does not really impact the liklihood for this one. For instance, the flavour should naturally lend itself well to some players fitting Lyncher. It's not as rare as you seem to be implying it is, but more importantly it explains your play thus far imo. Better than any other alignment at least. It's not a perfect fit, but it's close.
This is yet another example of you strawmanning my argument. It seems you've made something of a habit of doing that all game long. No, you do not have to play the same as Luk. However, there are certain behavioural tells one would expect of an investigator with a guilty check, tells that you have failed to match. I used Luk as contrast, because he was a confirmed investigator with a guilty check. It was to illustrate my wider point, which is that your behaviour does not match that of an investigator with a guilty check.
Firstly, I did call attention to it. I quoted that post to
@Tigerrr in the woods - please ensure you are reading the thread before engaging with me, as I'm not prepared to go spoonfeed you the quotes to excuse lazy play. Not with an hour to go in the day, at least. But this isn't even what I was referring to. I was referring to your pushing it this DP, which came after I had mentioned most of this.
No, this is an example of you strawmanning, and attacking whatever bastardisation of the argument you've constructed from mine.
Are you seriously accusing me of needing to steal from your vocabulary to argue my points? I use the term reconcile fairly often, I can't even remember you specifically using it. This is NAI, unless you're honestly trying to push using similar wording as you as a scum point?
It's impossible to assign a percentage to this. Statistics do not work that way. I would say it's fairly likely, because it would explain your behaviour Day 1, and it would explain your fake claim towards an investigation (though this latter is only from my point of view). It's why I've also tried to illustrate how your behaviour makes little sense coming from an investigator with a guilty check. I mean, just look how passive you are at actually pushing the lynch. You have a guilty on me, I seem to be getting away with it, and I see no attempt from you to persuade others to join your cause. Even last DP, you barely made any effort to actually get me lynched, despite from your perspective my lynch being even better than what Luk was offering. I mean, let's just think about it. You have a guilty on me, and yet few people are pushing for me. Indeed, i think more actually scum read you. There should be some degree of urgency, if not frustration, to make the lynch between one of us two, so that even if you are lynched, you can ensure I am swiftly followed. But there is nothing like that. You're happy to sit back, tell me you're not going to engage with me, while proceeding to do almost nothing but engage with me.
This is not an argument. It's simply an interpretation, one that I feel as not been substantially backed up, and also just so happens to be the one most convenient for you.