- Joined
- May 27, 2013
- Messages
- 7,922
- Reaction score
- 883
All men gotta do is gobble that booty up and we wouldn't have this problem.
You must be registered for see images
In the 1st month you can't even call it a living being...So she has the right to murder a child because she may be unhappy? Okay then.
lol really now?
Also don't bring up stuff like "conciousness doesn't exist here and there" since you don't know what conciousness really is nor where it comes from.
In the 1st month you can't even call it a living being...
It's forming, it's taking in nutrients to sustain itself, sounds living to me.In the 1st month you can't even call it a living being...
You'll be surprised to find that the baby is not technically alive for it to be considered murder at a certain time, when abortion is an option.
Tell me what happens if the developing zygote/fetus is cut off from the oxygen, nutrients and water the mother's body provdies please.
So she has the right to murder a child because she may be unhappy? Okay then.
If anything else, she just needs to keep her legs sealed to lower that chance.
Tell me what happens if the developing zygote/fetus is cut off from the oxygen, nutrients and water the mother's body provdies please.
It is has much of a living being as plants...It's forming, it's taking in nutrients to sustain itself, sounds living to me.
It is has much of a living being as plants...
Not sure on the certain time frame, but a baby/fetus/zygote is not alive to be considered murdered. A week old baby will not even be developed enough to "live" outside the mother. Now if all this is formed, then yes it would be murder.
Exactly, therefore it's a life taken when aborted.Yes, the mother is keeping it alive.
I watch Game of Thrones, it kind of mixed with my personality.Well doesn't this have a disgusting and repulsive sound to it?
What if I told you I feel bad when I step on grass?It is has much of a living being as plants...
Yes but the baby, is basically a parasite to the mother and will affect her life for the next 20 years. Why does she not get the choice to provide for the child or not.We should kill everyone in a coma by your logic. They're living, but they're not doing anything.
Right?
We should kill everyone in a coma by your logic. They're living, but they're not doing anything.
Right?
Yes but the baby, is basically a parasite to the mother and will affect her life for the next 20 years. Why does she not get the choice to provide for the child or not.
There is a serious demerit to leaving the baby alive.
The difference is that someone coma has been knocked in a coma, or has some disease causing a coma. A fetus is only forming to become a human being.
Key word is live.
She has the choice, and women will always have the choice. This is a debate on whether it's morally right or wrong, and in 9 out of 10 times, it's morally wrong.
In the 1st month you can't even call it a living being...