2/3 of wildlife estimated to be wiped out by 2020

[Lightbringer]

lmfao. I played my ace two turns ago.

[some conservationists have criticized the report's results, saying it could be "misleading."
"That's a fairly silly kind of number to report,"said Stuart Pimm, the Doris Duke Chair of Conservation Ecology at Duke University, referring to the overall 58% decline in wildlife populations."It mixes what's going on in the ocean with what's going on in the land. It mixes studies of bird populations in Europe with mammal populations in Africa. It has very few data points in South America."]


Discussion is now over.

You must have reading comprehension as I've already rebuked that statement and have mentioned that only a few people have voiced skepticism in thread, while also addressing that you didn't comprehend what was even said in the quote you posted.

Like I said before, elementary. Yes, discussion is now over as it seems you have nothing more to add.

 

[LoZelda101]

You must have reading comprehension as I've already rebuked that statement and have mentioned that only a few people have voiced skepticism in thread, while also addressing that you didn't comprehend what was even said in the quote you posted.

Like I said before, elementary. Yes, discussion is now over as it seems you have nothing more to add.

Doris Duke Chair of Conservation Ecology at Duke University > your opinion and WWF

 

[Lightbringer]

Doris Duke Chair of Conservation Ecology at Duke University > your opinion and WWF

Hmm except it's not my opinion but a study put forth by multiple renowned organizations from multiple countries with hundreds of researchers.

So you just credit the first name that disagrees with the study? Desperate are we? You literally can find anyone that disagrees with any subject. What matters is do you have data that supports what she said or no? I didn't think so.

So let's summarize. You made a dumb comment with no evidence to support what you said, then when I called you out it, you try to discredit the study with a quote because you have no evidence.

Thought this discussion was over?