Search results

  1. Infant

    [Discussion] Should Itachi be given full credit for owning the Sealing Blade?

    As we are told there, because he found it and kept it. The chakra armour is not called spirit weapon, onoy the sword and shield, which tells us they are different from the chakra armour. The blade being called a variant of the Kusanagi also tells us its not inherent to Itachi or his chakra armour.
  2. Infant

    [Discussion] Should Itachi be given full credit for owning the Sealing Blade?

    Its never been said that anyone can wield other blades either, sl that's not a point. On the other hand, no other weapon associated with the chakra armour has ever been separately named or searched for. The idea of a character needing full knowledge in order to comment on something is bad...
  3. Infant

    [Discussion] Should Itachi be given full credit for owning the Sealing Blade?

    Well, i tried to sort this out amicably but i was shot down for it (further proof that this is not a matter of conviction, because conviction ultimately works for the greator good) Throughout our discussions, @Avani has been offensive and berating me, not simply expressing disagreement but...
  4. Infant

    [Discussion] Should Itachi be given full credit for owning the Sealing Blade?

    We'll settle this after a private discussion
  5. Infant

    [Discussion] Should Itachi be given full credit for owning the Sealing Blade?

    What part of "show me" is a fact? What's the point of this ramble? Did i claim chakra isn't like this? Technically, there is a difference between spirit and spiritual. In this context, is there a difference? Is anything conclusive. Seriously man, you've just strawmanned me, attacked my...
  6. Infant

    [Discussion] Should Itachi be given full credit for owning the Sealing Blade?

    So its a logical deduction when you basically say: "show me someone else holding it" and you began your case by simply stating an opinion . . . But when i use multiple lines of reasoning, from differences in nature (spirit vs chakra) to knowledge of others (Orochimaru and Zetsu) and even find...
  7. Infant

    [Discussion] Should Itachi be given full credit for owning the Sealing Blade?

    Agreed. So what are these then? Anyway, to properly address your points . . . The fact that it is known specifically proves it is separate and known. Also, that Orochimaru knew about it tells of it being separate. Do you hear of Sasuke's chakra bow being heard about? No. The same with Madara...
  8. Infant

    [Discussion] Should Itachi be given full credit for owning the Sealing Blade?

    The first part is an oxymoron Training = skill, generally. The blade itself isn't guarded by the mirror. I actually don't disagree with this Logic says a weapon can be wielded by anyone. Unless we are given special conditions like with the Shark Blade which needs lots of chakra etc He...
  9. Infant

    [Discussion] Should Itachi be given full credit for owning the Sealing Blade?

    No, the Sealing Blade is its own weapon. Itachi keeps it in his chakra armour just as Orochimaru keeps his blade inside his body. The blade is independent. Proof is that Zetsu and Orochimaru knew about it despite a lack of knowledge about the chakra armour. More proof is that chakra armour...
  10. Infant

    [Discussion] Should Itachi be given full credit for owning the Sealing Blade?

    In terms of his hierarchy placement as a shinobi, how much credit should Itachi get for having the sealing blade? The reason i ask is because it doesn't seem to be inherently attached to him. Like, if he was using it in battle, an opponent like any Hyuga or Mist shinobi could use their...
Top