Search results

All women can give birth Infertile people can't give birth Therefore infertile people can't be women C;

Wow you're stupid. I asked him what are constitutes the role of a woman, and predicting he'd say the ability to give birth as one of them, and I refuted that using syllogism.

When did I say I think infertile women aren't women?

Precisely why they need to have an actual complete transition for this to even apply to them. And there are people who actually abuse adoption and dispute adoptive parents as "real" parents. The same way you can't just go "Yup I'm this kid's adoptive parent," the same way there are legal...

Of course they're different. And even though it's subjective, there are people who view adoptive parenting subjectively as well. I've seen people here say they aren't "real" parents. I think the difference is that, legally, one has been settled while the other has not yet. In this particularly...

Which brings up the scenario I gave C. City. If we refuse to treat him as something in this legal situation because he's not biologically that thing, then that can be applied to adoptive parents as well, not treating them the same as a biological parent in legal matters because they are not and...

It's viewed that that person gives up such rights to safety and government concerns when they commit crimes. Of course, people who commit non-violent crimes and pettier crimes are placed in prisons with less security than those who commit more serious crimes like murder and rape because they're...

Only if he's gone through a complete transition. Now what's your reasoning for why an adoptive parent should be treated as something they will biologically never be if you're not supposed to ever do that? You still have yet to actually explain that.

Not really. He didn't refute the connection between them at all. He just listed characteristics of a transsexual as though this broke the connection, when none of them did. Do you disagree that an adoptive parent shouldn't get the same treatment as a biological treatment because, no matter how...

The adoptive parent is factually still not the child's biological parent. It doesn't matter if they identify as the child's parent because factually, they are not the child's biological parent. Therefore, they should not receive the same legal treatment a biological parent would. That's what...

Did I? Of course you think you destroyed me. You're dumb enough to believe your own crap. Your logic only applies when you want it to. There's no actually reason it doesn't apply to an adoptive parent. Are you telling me giving an adoptive parent the same legal treatment as a biological parent...

No you didn't. Hey, I agree with you now. We should only treat people as what they biologically are, and if they are not biologically something, we don't treat them that way. So adoptive parents should never get the same treatment as biological parents. It's only biology and facts.

I should be more like you. Keep true to my values. Just like the way you believe an adoptive parent should never be treated like a biological parent because they are not, and no matter what, you don't treat someone by what they biologically aren't. No matter how badly they want to be treated...

I never said that. The transition actually makes an artificial vagina, though I'm not surprised you think the transition is simply slicing a penis off.

If the penis is removed then nope and the transition is complete, nope

That's the part that matters in this scenario

My logic is actually do that for someone who has actually completed the transition, not just one who thinks so.

See what I'm talking about? If all that matters are facts, then adoptive parents should never get the same legal treatment as biological parents because the fact is they aren't biological parents. Who are you?

They can't tell what analogies are. It's out of my hands.

You just need SlimReaper to call either of them a racist, homophobe, sexist or transphobe and you'll have the Holy Trinity