Search results

And now you did it again. I never said that they CAN'T ban him. I said that in my eyes, actions of either side lay within the same category. Dude, you're switching from one topic to another when quoting me, accusing me of being upset over things I wasn't even talking about, accusing me of...

Clearly you have the reading comprehension problem. I had written it very clearly in my first post in this thread - I was upset because the OP is proud for Brits because, in my opinion, they are doing something that is very similar to what Trump suggested - he wanted to ban people basing on...

Apparently I do for quite a few people who agreed with me in this thread, therefore it's your personal issue, buddy. I'm not interested in helping you fix it :rolleyes:

I wonder what led you to such a conclusion. I never said that what Brits are doing is illegal. I only said that it's dumb and hypocrite, just as well as what Trump did. :rolleyes:

Apparently the guys who have avys with Putin are from Russia then? :sdo: Dear lord. I've come to conclude that you're incapable of using simple logic and biased to no end. Sorry, but I'm ending this conversation. It's really pointless in my opinion. :rolleyes:

Really, dude? :| I'm about to break my nose with a facepalm.

Believe me, it's not happening. We have the same clown in Russia (his name is Vladimir Zhirinovsky, you can easily google up some information about him if you're interested) - one of his recent suggestions was to switch our political system to the absolute monarchy and the other one was to nuke...

Dude, do you even understand that there is a difference between wanting to do something and actually doing it? :| I may want to kill someone, I can even shout it out loud - for instance, when I'm angry, but unless I actually do it or at least try it, I haven't done anything illegal. And the...

Of course he shouldn't, but this still has nothing to do with my posts. And how exactly condemning those who are trying to do the same thing what Trump suggests is supporting Trump's ideas? Since you've edited your post, adding this, I'll edit mine. Well, at least you've admitted that they...

Yeah, I know. But this has nothing to do with the initial post of mine that you've quoted :| What are you trying to say to me? That he's a flawed person and his suggestions are very doubtful to say the least? I know that shit, bruh. And I never tried to deny it.

Yeah, that's an interesting point of view, but no. By expressing his opinion, by no means he's murdering, burying and destroying anything. And he's not a president, we're talking about very precise things here, no need to be so tangent if you don't have the arguments to prove your point.

Yeah, so? He's free to want whatever he wants to want unless he actually does something against the law, and the others are free to reject his proposals if they don't like them. But banning a person for his beliefs and words alone is exactly what I said it is - the very flawed thing Trump...

Exactly this. Ironically, they and those who support them are doing the very same thing he himself suggested by trying to ban him for his opinion and beliefs. You guys are not any better than Trump himself.

So-o-o... they basically want to ban him for expressing his opinion, since he didn't do anything else. Is this the western way of securing the freedom of speech? Yes, definitely worths being proud for it :lol

Why do you feel the necessity of excusing yourself? :| It's not like I'm asking you something, I've merely stated that your position is now clear to me. And what's with that "you don't know what an opinion is" part? Another baseless assumption of yours? :lol Although that's to be expected after...

@bold - oh, now I see. Figured as much :lol

Interesting, so you base your opinion that agressively supports one of the sides of this conflict on the lack of facts? :lol Clever.

Since when liking a thread means agreeing with some specific information in it? :| Unlike you, I do not base my posts on assumptions and far fetched conclusions.

Still, it doesn't prove anything for this current situation. Any conclusions like "they are lying" or "no the other ones are lying" are way too fartetched for now. Such claims only show low level of intelligence of those who make them, because if it was that simple, we would've already been in...

A bold claim. What proof do you have? As far as I can see, it's words against words right now.