which of the two do you think is better? I just re watched them both and I have to side with Spiderman as I found it more emotionally compelling, which the dark knight doesn't give me . Though the dark knight probably has more interesting villains.
what do you think?
I've always been confused by them, in what order should I watch them? And are the movies Canon as well? last Dragon ball I watched was GT, where should i go from there
I hear a lot comments that say 'part two was great but went downhill after Pain arc'.Personally I thought even the kage summit was good (even though the naruto/sasuke confrontation could have been better.Ultimate ninja storm 3 nailed it!).
so my question is what things don't people like about...
I mean the balance of this movie was just perfect! Believable plot, Story development, Action and the feels,"He's my friend","So was I" 10/10.
My overall favs would include
Dark night rises
First Avengers
Toby's Spider-Man franchise
X-Men: the last stand,Day's of future past & first class...
I don't think it was ever stated in the manga but from his fight with Pain, it seems it explodes at will.I've always imagined the mechanism behind it us similar to what deidara does
You have to understand the word's canon and filler apply only to manga readers (and kishi zealots). The concept does not hold any merit to anime only viewers.So if one wants to discuss anime content, talk to anime watchers cause to manga readers most of that stuff is filler and they'll treat it...
I've always wonderd if the people who complain about the anime adding extra content to fill in manga left gaps do the same about 'filler' content in fights.for example, the kakashi vs obito fight in the anime is vastly superior to the one in manga. Do the moaners complain about the anime's...