Truth about CoD
- Thread starter Zlad
- Start date
Arcaneos510X
Active member
-immortal-
Active member
Awards
Trololo battlefield 3 better grafics better stroy line 
Cod fans are so mad
you can't do this in Cod is see
Cod fans are so mad
You must be registered for see images
you can't do this in Cod is see
:OOOO i'm ready if they hit the fan, hehe
Trololo battlefield 3 better grafics better stroy line
You must be registered for see images
you can't do this in Cod is see
You must be registered for see images
^ looks fcking lame, and they don't do anything to the multiplayer. CoD release their game every year while battlefield use their time to make it good. Most people even play it now
Last edited:
JIRAIYA perv
Active member
never really liked COD (all COD'S are the same .... crap), and i don't even know why people love it that much (they can't even explain it themselves) and its way too easy to master. BF3 is awesome and not as easy as COD, it has better graphics, a LOT more realistic and rewards you for team work (better in all aspects). COD is more like a bad habit that people got used too .....
Q of the Sharingan
Active member
People who decide to play one game and flame the other are idiots. I love both games. I play either one depending on the mood I am in. They have two different play styles that fit different players.
ps. The graphics on CoD look fine to me.
ps. The graphics on CoD look fine to me.
JIRAIYA perv
Active member
oh and what about activision not making a difference in each COD they make (they are using their huge fan base's stupidity). they make the same game each time with slight silly differences and people still blindly buy it without thinking. like whatever you want (am not even a big shooter fan) but at least be honest and admit witch is the better game. at least say one thing COD can do better than BF3, name ONE thing ??
Last edited:
I fully agree with this guy ^.
The CoD fans will defend CoD, and the same with battlefield....
(to be honest, i dont like battlefield. But thats my personal opinion. But i dont go round saying how crap battlefield is, because i know it is a good game. It's just not my thing)
All threads like this do is start a stupid argument with no winner.
So congrats on making your thread that has already been made 100's of times before, and still has the same outcome
JIRAIYA perv
Active member
sorry bro but sometimes saying that both are good is just silly, i played all COD games and BF3, now there is no such thing as they are both good, one game has to be better than the other and not a single COD fan gave me one thing COD does better than BF3, some one give one valid aspect about COD that is better ..... every one is free to like whatever they choose to like of course, but at least say WHY do you like it ??
Q of the Sharingan
Active member
You act like they should redo the entire game from the ground up. It is a game series, a continuation of games. It is not supposed to be entirely new games each year. Also, the developers switch off each year to make a game, so the continuation of each series is released every two years. The amount of differences between Blops 1 and 2 for example are about the same BF bad company 2 and BF3 (I'm not bringing BF2 into this since it is rather old). The games have the same mechanics yes, but they change aspects of them that make them different from their predecessors. That is why people can say how they like each more than the other. They are different. You probably don't play the CoDs and just go off of what CoD haters and what little advertising you see.
As for your last question. CoD offers a generally faster type of play and more reward for doing well than BF. I like BF3 more than MW3 but I like MW2 (minus the dangerclose nubetubing) and Blops 2 just as much as BF3. Like I said, it just depends on my mood. Do I want a larger battlefield with slower and more diverse approaches at play, or a smaller battlefield with faster and more direct approaches at play.
(and how can you give an honest opinion on the games if you are, like you said yourself, "not even a big shooter fan?"
JIRAIYA perv
Active member
actually i played all COD's and all BF'S (am not a big shooter fan but i do play shooters from time to time and am quit good at it), now if you are actually saying that each COD is different then sorry but you are the first COD fan to say that (black opps 1 was the best but thats not even the same team that makes the original COD'S aka war fare), they use the same engine for god's sake and no the company is not making an effort to make a great NEW game (push the envelope) because they know they don't have too (their fans will still blindly buy it) now you still didn't give me one aspect that is better in COD. don't tell me its faster tell something that the game makers made better, if COD has something better i will say it myself but it doesn't have anything.
Never heard of it, and I don't even need to hear about it either.
CoD is like iPhone, they never change it
JIRAIYA perv
Active member
Q of the Sharingan
Active member
So you want a comparison of the games to each other? The only thing that is similar about them is their genre. If you have played all of the games as you say then you should know this. If both games had killstreaks(or scorestreaks they are know now) then I could make a comparison. If they both had vehicles that you could use without earning them then I could compare them. They both have different aspects that appeal to different play types. You wanting a raw comparison in the way you have explained shows that you are ignorant of this fact.
To explain what I mean, here are a few examples of what I could say depending on which game I favored
CoD is better due to the fact that its guns have less overall and more predictable recoil than BF
BF is better due to its more realistic take on recoil for firearms
CoD is better due to its smaller maps forcing the game to be played at a faster pace than BF
BF is better due to its larger maps adding more variety and options to approach on gameplay.
CoD is better due to having earned rewards (kill/scorestreaks)
Battlefield is better due to being able to access vehicles without having to earn them.
CoD is better due to taking less shots to kill people than BF
BF is better due to taking more shots to kille people than CoD.
CoD is better due to sniper rifles killing people more easily, as they should.
BF is better due to sniping having a more realistic approach and requiring more skill and patience. (I love sniping on both games by the way, QSing and realistic sniping are both fun).
These are only a few examples on how the differences in the games can affect OPINION.
Are you satisfied?
Saying both is good is never stupid??
Someone who worships one game, and puts every other game down, is the exact definition of "Fanboy".
And like i said in my first post, everyone has their favourites. But thats no reason to go round calling the other games crap because they arent to that 1 person's taste... I like most games. i prefer CoD, but i never go round saying that BF is bad...
I know CoD never changes, but i like it the way that it is. So it doesnt bother me...
Each to their own opinion.
& in answer to your statement: I prefer CoD because ...
1. (for me) it feels faster paced. Which i find more to my liking, and easy to play.
Which leads to point number two..
2. I'm better at it, so obviously find it more enjoyable
Simple
Q of the Sharingan
Active member
A friend of mine doesn't like BF3 for the same reasons. He just could not get a feel for the play style. His opinion though, so nothing wrong with it.