[READ] The solution to VS threads!

[~Puppet Master~]

Puppet Master's Power Formula

Before you read, ignore the title, it was just to catch people's attention. I've been thinking about this for a while, people have been making top 10 lists since the dawn of time and I have yet to see a perfect one. Now I thought that maths might do the job, I've created a formula that can measure a character's strenght by giving them a certain grade, between 1 and 20, here's how it works:

By taking important and overlooked factors into account, we can now mix those together with their weaknesses and give them an appropriate grade, these are the factors I'm using:

Spoiler

Intelligence
(1-10) Measured by one's analysing abilities, how well they think during battle and plans they've created.
1 is reckless, like Hidan and A, 10 is very observant and strategic, like Itachi

Battle experience
(1-10) Calculated, average age of becoming a ninja is 12.
Current age - age they became ninja / 5

Feats
(1-10) Measured by the amount of feats and their relevance.
1 is no feats, 10 is many significant feats

Power level
(1-10) Measure by ninjutsu/physical strength/overall lethality and kill rate.
1 is weak, 10 is extremely dangerous/lethal and destructive power

Speed
(1-10) Measured from base speed ( Naruto ) to instant speed ( FTG ).
1 is regular speed, like Shikamaru, 10 is instant transmission like Minato

Durability
(1-20) How long someone will last during battle and wether big attacks will wear them out.
1 is perfectly durable, like Orochimaru and Sasori, 20 is low stamina, or MS decreasing one's eyesight

Weakness
(2-3) Measured by the amount- and severity of one’s weaknesses, and how exploitable they are.
2 is no weaknesses, 3 is lots of exploitable weaknesses

These factors can get a balanced overview of everyone's abilities, and they can be made into a formula:

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

If you fill out the factors for a certain character, you will get their grade, here are some examples:

Spoiler

EXAMPLE FOR OROCHIMARU INT: (8/10) EXP: 54-12=42 42/4=10,5 (10/10) FTS: (7/10) LVL: (9/10) SPD: (5/10) DBT: (1/20) WKS: (2,2/3) (8+10+7+9+5-1)/2,2= 17,3

EXAMPLE FOR KAKASHI INT: (8/10) EXP: 30-12=18 18/4=4,5 (4,5/10) FTS: (1/10) LVL: (8/10) SPD: (7/10) DBT: (3/10) WKS: (2,2/3) (8+4,5+1+8+7-3)/2,2= 11,6

EXAMPLE FOR INO INT: (3/10) EXP: 16-12=4 4/4=1 (1/10) FTS: (1/10) LVL: (2/10) SPD: (1/10) DBT: (3/10) WKS: (2,6/10) (3+1+1+2+1-3)/2,6= 1,9

EXAMPLE FOR EDO MADARA INT: (7/10) EXP: 50-12=38 38/4=9,5 (9,5/10) FTS: (7/10) LVL: (10/10) SPD: (7/10) DBT: (1/10) WKS: (2/3) (7+9,5+7+10+7-1)/2= 19,8

Why is this useful?

Now we can use A > B logic, since these grades are legit. People who are underrated like Zabuza just because they were trolled, can now get their true strenght exposed. It's very useful for top 10 threads and vs threads.

 

[~Madara Uchiha~]

mabye ill use this in my next Madara>Hashirama thread thanks man

 

[ProjectOuterspace]

Feats
(1-10) Measured by the amount of feats and their relevance.
1 is no feats, 10 is many significant feats


That part is pointless.

Hidan has no notable feats yet kills Asuma who has a bunch of notable feats like being part of the legendary 12 monks.

And who decides any of these things?

People will argue what their different stats are and no one will be able to say it is cannon.

Then people will disagree on what a notable feat is etc etc.

 

[Summer]

As much as this idea is good no new member follows how a proper v.s thread should be anyways they just assume.

 

[History]

***** just because i liked how you layed everything out

 

[Young Thug]

As much as this idea is good no new member follows how a proper v.s thread should be anyways they just assume.

this

 

[Edo Odin]

THIS is someone that truly deserves a *****

You must be registered for see images

 

[huzaifa555]

Nice rubric bro. Thank you also btw.

 

[Punk Hazard]

No. VS threads are to voice opinions on certain match-ups. To have this would defeat that purpose. With this, there's no discussion or imagination.

 

[Deadai]

very creative, If I didint already + rep you earlier for yo sexy avi( xd ) I would + rep you again

 

[Roofy128]

this wouldnt work, lets look at naruto vs neji (old fight and still a good one) neji at that time neji would be much better and stronger than naruto but the 9 tails was the game changer and so even tho neji would be higher using ur 'maths' he still lost

same thing happened when naruto vs 6pop

 

[~Puppet Master~]

Feats
(1-10) Measured by the amount of feats and their relevance.
1 is no feats, 10 is many significant feats


That part is pointless.

Hidan has no notable feats yet kills Asuma who has a bunch of notable feats like being part of the legendary 12 monks.

And who decides any of these things?

People will argue what their different stats are and no one will be able to say it is cannon.

Then people will disagree on what a notable feat is etc etc.

There's more to this than just feats, I think it works, someone's score should be discussed of course, not made by just one person, that's why I included the calculations.

As much as this idea is good no new member follows how a proper v.s thread should be anyways they just assume.

I know, but I just had this idea stuck in my mind, I do think it works, so I felt like posting it.

 

[Negative Knight]

A Pretty efficient system, it just needs some tweaks to get it as close as it can get to perfect.

No. VS threads are to voice opinions on certain match-ups. To have this would defeat that purpose. With this, there's no discussion or imagination.

As for Riker, this could be used as a foundation for Vs Threads in not underrating characters. I hardly think everyone will blindly accept 2 figures which could easily vary due to over-performance in one section and under-performance in another e.g. for Itachi if Stamina was a factor

VS Threads would go on as normal.

 

[Chatte]

And when I was saying that battle experience is an important factor, people though I'm crazy...

Great post!

 

[Rodukaime Namikaze]

No. VS threads are to voice opinions on certain match-ups. To have this would defeat that purpose. With this, there's no discussion or imagination.

the biased opinion is what we want lol

 

[kakashi isboss]

its a nice idea but it woulnt work people will always disagree about certain ratings and their are times when lower ranked people could beat higher ranked people

 

[Negative Knight]

And when I was saying that battle experience is an important factor, people though I'm crazy...

Great post!

At least I didn't, Kakuzu was 91 Years old

 

[Ciberr]

This should be a sticky.

 

[Chatte]

At least I didn't, Kakuzu was 91 Years old

You know you are out of the question.

 

[Punk Hazard]

A Pretty efficient system, it just needs some tweaks to get it as close as it can get to perfect.



As for Riker, this could be used as a foundation for Vs Threads in not underrating characters. I hardly think everyone will blindly accept 2 figures which could easily vary due to over-performance in one section and under-performance in another e.g. for Itachi if Stamina was a factor

VS Threads would go on as normal.

Not really. Someone can just say "This char.'s score>that char.'s and that's the thread.

the biased opinion is what we want lol

Yes. A discussion should be opinions melded with facts, not one of the two. That's just boring.